Corn Invertebrate Loss Estimates from the United States and Ontario, Canada — 2025
Published: 03/09/2026
DOI: doi.org/10.31274/cpn-20260309-0
CPN-2019-25
Invertebrate pests (insects, mites, and slugs) annually reduce corn yield in the United States and Canada. The abundance and impacts of these pests vary from year to year, and their effects on yield depend on many factors, including weather conditions, crop production practices, and hybrid selection that influences susceptibility to invertebrate feeding.
The U.S. produced more than 17.0 billion bushels of corn in 2025, while the province of Ontario, Canada, produced nearly 0.4 billion bushels. Extension specialists representing 28 corn-producing U.S. states and Ontario, Canada, estimated the percent yield loss from corn invertebrate pests. These reports account for more than 16.9 billion bushels (97.3 percent) of the total corn produced in the U.S. and Ontario in 2025 (Figure 1). The yield loss estimates include invertebrate pests that feed on foliar, root, ear, and stalk tissue. Yield-loss estimates do not include diseases transmitted by invertebrates. Estimates are mostly for grain corn (including non-Bt hybrids) but can also include popcorn, silage, and sweet corn.
This publication documents the impact of major invertebrate pests on corn production during 2025. Extension entomologists began tracking these data in 2021 and revise estimates annually. It is important to note that methods for estimating losses from invertebrate pests vary by state or province. The estimates may be based on statewide surveys, personal experience, and feedback from university extension personnel, industry representatives, and farmers.
Maximum yield before losses due to invertebrates was estimated for each state or province using this formula: (total harvested bushels/[{100 – percent estimated invertebrate pest loss}/100]). Total bushels lost per invertebrate pest were then formulated ([percent loss/100] x yield before estimated loss) for each state or province.
U.S. and Canadian farmers also have expenses to control invertebrate pests of corn, including technology fees (included in the cost of seed and difficult to estimate), seed-applied insecticides, and soil and foliar insecticides and acaricides. These expenses to prevent potential losses are not included in our calculations; thus, the values in this publication underestimate the impact of invertebrate pests on U.S. and Canadian corn production.
Figure 1. Proportion of 2025 corn production by state or province for the 28 U.S. states and Ontario, Canada, that participated in this survey. This figure represents 97.3 percent (16.9 billion bushels) of corn produced across the U.S. and Ontario, Canada. *Represents AL, DE, FL, GA, MD, NY, OK, SC, and VA.
Estimated 2025 Invertebrate Losses
In 2025, invertebrate pests reduced corn yield by an estimated 3.2 percent across 28 states and by 2.5 percent in Ontario, translating into an overall estimated loss of more than 554.6 million bushels. As in 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024, corn rootworms were estimated to have caused the greatest yield loss overall (Figure 2). Estimated losses from all other invertebrates combined were 50 million bushels less than losses caused by corn rootworms. Other important invertebrate pests in terms of yield loss were western bean cutworm (Figure 3), corn earworm, grasshoppers, twospotted spider mite, and true armyworm. Table 1 summarizes yield-loss estimates for invertebrate pests affecting corn production in the U.S. and Canada; Figure 4 illustrates the proportions of yield loss for the most injurious pests.
Table 1. Estimated corn yield losses (thousands of bushels) due to invertebrate pests in 28 U.S. corn-producing states1 and Ontario, Canada, in 2025.
Invertebrate pest | Total U.S. losses (thousands of bushels) | Total Ontario losses (thousands of bushels) |
|---|---|---|
Corn rootworms2 | 293,222.6 | 9,584.6 |
Western bean cutworm | 90,909.3 | 3.8 |
Corn earworm | 71,356.5 | 0.0 |
Grasshoppers (multiple species) | 22,219.8 | 0.0 |
Twospotted spider mite | 13,557.9 | 0.0 |
True armyworm | 10,371.8 | 0.0 |
Stink bugs3 | 8,574.3 | 0.0 |
Wireworms (multiple species) | 8,454.8 | 0.0 |
Seedcorn maggot | 8,311.5 | 0.4 |
Other cutworms4 | 4,003.3 | 0.0 |
Banks grass mite | 3,509.1 | 0.0 |
Southwestern corn borer | 2,163.6 | 0.0 |
European corn borer | 2,134.7 | 3.8 |
Grubs5 | 1,883.1 | 0.0 |
Black cutworm6 | 1,355.8 | 0.0 |
Aphids7 | 899.0 | 0.0 |
Fall armyworm | 588.6 | 19.2 |
Asiatic garden beetle | 341.9 | 0.0 |
Sap beetle (multiple species) | 308.1 | 0.0 |
Slugs (multiple species) | 280.9 | 38.3 |
Other arthropods8 | 233.1 | 0.0 |
Billbugs (multiple species) | 134.2 | 0.0 |
Chinch bugs | 34.5 | 0.0 |
Corn flea beetle | 33.4 | 0.0 |
Stalk borer | 32.1 | 0.0 |
Colaspis beetles9 | 23.6 | 0.0 |
Cereal leaf beetle | 9.5 | 0.0 |
Corn thrips | 3.1 | 0.0 |
Sugarcane borer | 2.9 | 0.0 |
Cornsilk fly10 | 1.5 | 0.0 |
Sugarcane beetle | 0.2 | 0.0 |
Beet armyworm | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Corn blotch leafminer | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Hop vine borer | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Leafrollers11 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Lesser cornstalk borer | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Seedcorn beetle and slender seedcorn beetle | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Sod webworms (multiple species) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Yellowstriped armyworm | 0.0 | 0.0 |
1 Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Wisconsin; 2 Diabrotica barberi, D. virgifera virgifera, D. undecimpunctata howardi, and D. virgifera zeae; 3 Chinavia hilaris, Euschistus spp., Halyomorpha halys, and Nezara viridula; 4 Nephelodes minians, Feltia jaculifera, Apamea devastator, Euxoa detersa, and Peridroma saucia. May also include Agrotis ipsilon (MD); 5 Popillia japonica (immature) and Phyllophaga spp.; 6 May also include cutworms in general (MD); 7 Rhopalosiphum padi, R. maidis, and Aphis protaphis middletonii; 8 Systena frontalis (SD), Meromyza americana (NE), and Dalbulus maidis (KS, LA, MO, OK, TX). The presence of D. maidis was noted in two states, but with no yield losses attributed to it (KS, LA); three states attributed losses to corn stunt, the disease vectored by this insect, but losses due to corn stunt are not included in this report (MO, OK, TX); 9 Colaspis brunnea and Colaspis crinicornis; 10 Chaetopsis massayla, Euxesta annonae, E. eluta, and E. stigmatias; 11 Choristoneura parallela and Xenotemna pallorana.
Figure 2. Corn rootworms were estimated to reduce overall corn yield in the U.S. and Ontario by 302.8 million bushels in 2025, and ranked as the greatest invertebrate cause of corn yield loss. Although corn rootworm adults can feed on corn foliar tissue and cut silks, the primary yield reduction occurs through root injury by larvae.
Christian Krupke, Purdue University
Figure 3. Western bean cutworm was estimated to reduce overall yield in the U.S. and Ontario by 90.9 million bushels in 2025, and ranked as the second greatest invertebrate cause of corn yield loss.
Julie Peterson, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Figure 4. Common name and relative proportion of estimated yield losses for invertebrate pests of corn in 2025. The category ‘all others’ includes all species listed in Table 1, except the 10 highlighted here.
Invertebrate Pests by Production Region
The states reporting data from the western corn-growing region accounted for 71.5 percent of U.S. and Ontario corn production. Corn rootworms caused the most injury in this region (Table 2), due to the high amount of intensive continuous corn and Bt-resistant rootworm populations. Western bean cutworm, corn earworm, grasshoppers, and twospotted spider mite caused the greatest estimated yield losses after corn rootworm.
The states reporting data from the Great Lakes region accounted for 17.5 percent of U.S. and Ontario corn production. As in the western region, corn rootworm caused the greatest estimated yield loss (Table 3); however, the next greatest causes of yield loss differ in the Great Lakes region. In descending order, grasshoppers, true armyworm, Asiatic garden beetle, and seedcorn maggot caused the next greatest losses. In this region, it is estimated that 1.3 percent of corn yield was lost due to invertebrate activity.
The states reporting data for the southern region represented 8.3 percent of the total corn produced in the U.S. and Ontario in 2025. Overall, losses due to corn invertebrate pests across southern states were very low (0.9 percent) (Table 4) compared to the western corn-growing region (3.9 percent) in 2025. Stink bugs caused the greatest yield loss in the southern states, followed by southwestern corn borer, corn earworm, corn rootworms, and Banks grass mite.
Yield losses caused by insect-vectored diseases are generally not included in these reports. However, the authors wanted to convey the serious impact of corn stunt, a disease vectored by the corn leafhopper (Dalbulus maidis), in some U.S. states. Although not included in any tables or other data reported here, losses due to corn stunt were estimated to be 14.1 million bushels in Texas and 6.9 million bushels in Oklahoma. These losses indicate that the corn leafhopper, through the spread of pathogens causing corn stunt, was responsible for 4.6 times the next greatest cause of invertebrate pest losses (stink bugs) in the southern region. Missouri also experienced losses attributed to corn stunt, but to a much lesser extent (4,767 bushels).
Table 2. Estimated corn yield losses due to the five most-significant invertebrates in western corn-growing U.S. states1, in 2025.
Rank | Invertebrate Pest | Total losses (thousands of bushels) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Region | Overall | ||
1 | 1 | Corn rootworms2 | 265,093.8 |
2 | 2 | Western bean cutworm | 90,648.7 |
3 | 3 | Corn earworm | 69,697.9 |
4 | 4 | Grasshoppers (multiple species) | 20,395.6 |
5 | 5 | Twospotted spider mite | 12,345.6 |
1 Colorado, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota; 2 Diabrotica barberi, D. virgifera virgifera, and D. undecimpunctata howardi.
Table 3. Estimated corn yield losses due to the five most-significant invertebrates in the Great Lakes region of the U.S. and Ontario, Canada1, in 2025.
Rank | Invertebrate Pest | Total losses (thousands of bushels) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Region | Overall | ||
1 | 1 | Corn rootworms2 | 36,425.7 |
2 | 4 | Grasshoppers (multiple species) | 1,581.6 |
3 | 6 | True armyworm | 818.2 |
4 | 18 | Asiatic garden beetle | 341.9 |
5 | 9 | Seedcorn maggot | 326.7 |
1 Indiana, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Ontario, Canada; 2 Diabrotica barberi, D. virgifera virgifera, and D. undecimpunctata howardi.
Table 4. Estimated corn yield losses due to the five most-significant invertebrates in southern U.S. states1, in 2025.
Rank | Invertebrate Pest | Total losses (thousands of bushels) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Region | Overall | ||
1 | 7 | Stink bugs2 | 4,548.5 |
2 | 12 | Southwestern corn borer | 2,133.0 |
3 | 3 | Corn earworm | 1,582.0 |
4 | 1 | Corn rootworms3 | 1,287.6 |
5 | 11 | Banks grass mite | 1,276.7 |
1 Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia; 2 Chinavia hilaris, Euschistus spp., Halyomorpha halys, and Nezara viridula; 3 Diabrotica barberi, D. virgifera virgifera, D. undecimpunctata howardi, and D. virgifera zeae.
Disclaimer
The invertebrate pest loss estimates in this publication were provided primarily by extension specialists across the U.S. and Ontario, Canada. This information is only a guide. The values in this publication are not intended to be exact measures of corn yield losses due to invertebrate pests since they were not quantitatively measured. Participants assume no liability resulting from the use of these estimates. Hence, these losses should be approached with caution when examined for a particular state. However, they can be useful for comparing general trends across years or within a given year across regions. Values reported in this document were accurate as of the publication date and do not reflect corrections or updates occurring since that time.
Acknowledgements
Authors
Dominic Reisig, North Carolina State University; Scott Graham, Auburn University; Nick Bateman and Glenn Studebaker, University of Arkansas; Ron Meyer, Colorado State University; Francis Reay-Jones, Clemson University; Ken Wise, Cornell University; David Owens, University of Delaware; Isaac Esquivel, University of Florida; G. David Buntin, University of Georgia; Jocelyn Smith, University of Guelph; Nick Seiter, University of Illinois; Adam Sisson, Iowa State University; Anthony Zukoff, Kansas State University; Dawson Kerns, LSU AgCenter; Kelly Hamby, University of Maryland; Chris DiFonzo, Michigan State University; Fei Yang, University of Minnesota; Whitney Crow and Tyler Towles, Mississippi State University; Chase Floyd and Ivair Valmorbida, University of Missouri; Pin-Chu Lai and Julie Peterson, University of Nebraska; Patrick Beauzay and Janet Knodel, North Dakota State University; Ashleigh Faris, Oklahoma State University; Christian Krupke, Purdue University; Kelley Tilmon, Ohio State University; Tracey Baute, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Agriculture; Adam Varenhorst, South Dakota State University; Sebe Brown, University of Tennessee; David Kerns and Pat Porter, Texas A&M University; Tim Bryant, Virginia Tech; and Emily Bick, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Reviewers
Daren Mueller, Iowa State University and Kiersten Wise, University of Kentucky.
Production data from the United States Department of Agriculture-National Agriculture Statistics Service and Statistics Canada.
United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service. Quick Stats Database. Accessed 31 January 2026.
Statistics Canada. Table 32-10-0359-01. Estimated areas, yield, production, average farm price, and total farm value of principal field crops, in metric and imperial units. Accessed 20 January 2026.
Sponsors
In addition to support from the United States Department of Agriculture - National Institute of Food and Agriculture, this project was partly funded by the National Corn Growers Association and the Grain Farmers of Ontario through the Sustainable Canadian Agricultural Partnership (Sustainable CAP), a federal-provincial-territorial initiative.
How to cite: Reisig, D., Graham, S., Bateman, N., Studebaker, G., Meyer, R., Reay-Jones, F., Wise, K., Owens, D., Esquivel, I., Buntin, G. D., Smith, J., Seiter, N., Sisson, A., Zukoff, A., Kerns, D., Hamby, K., DiFonzo, C., Yang, F., Crow, W., Towles, T., Floyd, C., Valmorbida, I., Lai, P., Peterson, J., Beauzay, P., Knodel, J., Faris, A., Krupke, C., Tilmon, K., Baute, T., Varenhorst, A., Brown, S., Kerns, D., Porter, P., Bryant, T., Bick, E. 2026. Corn Invertebrate Loss Estimates from the United States and Ontario, Canada — 2025. Crop Protection Network. CPN-2019-25. doi.org/10.31274/cpn-20260309-0.
This publication was developed by the Crop Protection Network, a multi-state and international collaboration of university/provincial extension specialists and public/ private professionals that provides unbiased, research-based information to farmers and agricultural personnel. This information in this publication is only a guide, and the authors assume no liability for practices implemented based on this information. Reference to products in this publication is not intended to be an endorsement to the exclusion of others that may be similar. Individuals using such products assume responsibility for their use in accordance with current directions of the manufacturer.
In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the State or local Agency that administers the program or contact USDA through the Telecommunications Relay Service at 711 (voice and TTY). Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Mail Stop 9410, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov.
This work is supported by the Crop Protection and Pest Management Extension Implementation Program from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
©2026 by the Crop Protection Network. All rights reserved.