Corn Invertebrate Loss Estimates from the United States and Ontario, Canada — 2024
Published: 02/17/2025
DOI: doi.org/10.31274/cpn-20250224-1
CPN-2019-24
Invertebrate pests (insects, mites, and slugs) annually reduce corn yield in the United States and Canada. The abundance and impacts of these pests vary from year to year, and their effect on yield is based on many factors, including weather conditions, crop production practices, and hybrid selection and susceptibility to invertebrate feeding.
The U.S. produced almost 14.9 billion bushels of corn in 2024, while the province of Ontario, Canada produced nearly 0.4 billion bushels. Extension specialists representing 29 corn-producing U.S. states and Ontario, Canada, estimated the percent yield loss from corn invertebrate pests. These reports account for more than 15.0 billion bushels (98.7 percent) of the total corn produced in the U.S. and Ontario in 2024 (Figure 1). The yield loss estimates include foliar, root, ear, and stalk feeding invertebrate pests. Yield loss estimates are not inclusive of diseases transmitted by invertebrates. Estimates are mostly for grain corn but can also include popcorn and sweetcorn. Data from Florida and Oklahoma were added in 2024.
This publication documents the impact of major invertebrate pests on corn production during 2024. Extension entomologists began tracking these data in 2021 and revise estimates annually. It is important to note that methods for estimating losses from invertebrate pests vary by state or province. The estimates may be based on statewide surveys, personal experience, and feedback from university extension personnel, industry representatives, and farmers.
Maximum yield before losses due to invertebrates was estimated for each state or province using this formula: (total harvested bushels/[{100 – percent estimated invertebrate pest loss}/100]). Total bushels lost per invertebrate pest were then formulated ([percent loss/100] x yield before estimated loss) for each state or province.
U.S. and Canadian farmers have expenses to control invertebrate pests of corn in the form of technology fees (included in the cost of seed and not easy to estimate), seed-applied insecticides, and soil and foliar insecticides and acaricides. These expenses to prevent potential losses are not included in our calculations; thus, the values in this publication underestimate the impact of invertebrate pests on U.S. and Canadian corn production.
Figure 1. Proportion of 2024 corn production by state or province for the 29 U.S. states and Ontario, Canada, that participated in this survey. This figure represents 98.7 percent (15.0 billion bushels) of corn produced across the U.S. and Ontario, Canada. *Represents AL, DE, FL, and SC.
Estimated 2024 Invertebrate Losses
In 2024, invertebrate pests reduced corn yield by an estimated 4.0 percent across 29 states and by 1.3 percent in Ontario, translating into an overall estimated loss of more than 610 million bushels. As in 2021, 2022, and 2023, corn rootworms were estimated to have caused the greatest yield loss overall. Estimated losses from all other invertebrates combined were 82 million bushels less than losses caused by corn rootworms. Other important invertebrate pests in terms of yield loss were western bean cutworm, corn earworm (Figure 2), twospotted spider mite, Banks grass mite, and grasshoppers. Table 1 summarizes yield loss estimates for invertebrate pests reported in corn production in the U.S. and Canada; Figure 3 illustrates the proportion of yield loss for the most injurious pests.
Table 1. Estimated corn yield losses (thousands of bushels) due to invertebrate pests in 29 U.S. corn-producing states1 and Ontario, Canada in 2024.
Invertebrate pest | Total U.S. losses (thousands of bushels) | Total Ontario losses (thousands of bushels) |
---|---|---|
Corn rootworm2 | 342,418.1 | 3,840.7 |
Western bean cutworm | 93,667.5 | 768.1 |
Corn earworm | 47,719.8 | 3.8 |
Twospotted spider mite | 35,319.2 | 0.0 |
Banks grass mite | 22,571.4 | 0.0 |
Grasshopper (multiple species) | 18,019.4 | 0.0 |
Black cutworm3 | 10,542.0 | 3.8 |
Stink bug4 | 7,668.6 | 0.0 |
Slugs (multiple species) | 5,739.9 | 384.1 |
Asiatic garden beetle | 4,625.2 | 0.0 |
True armyworm | 3,973.6 | 0.0 |
Aphids5 | 3,038.4 | 3.8 |
Southwestern corn borer | 2,899.8 | 0.0 |
European corn borer | 2,436.2 | 3.8 |
White Grub6 | 1,090.9 | 0.0 |
Seedcorn maggot | 858.0 | 38.4 |
Corn leafhopper7 | 832.3 | 0.0 |
Wireworm (multiple species) | 526.4 | 3.8 |
Fall armyworm | 463.9 | 0.0 |
Sap beetle (multiple species) | 251.5 | 0.0 |
Other cutworms8 | 241.6 | 3.8 |
Leafroller9 | 144.0 | 0.0 |
Billbugs (multiple species) | 72.8 | 0.0 |
Chinch bug | 31.6 | 0.0 |
Stalk borer | 26.0 | 0.0 |
Yellowstriped armyworm | 18.3 | 0.0 |
Corn flea beetle | 17.3 | 0.0 |
Beet armyworm10 | 6.7 | 0.0 |
Cereal leaf beetle | 5.1 | 0.0 |
Corn thrips | 2.4 | 0.0 |
Sugarcane borer | 2.2 | 0.0 |
Sugarcane beetle | 0.9 | 0.0 |
Corn blotch leafminer | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Cornsilk fly11 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Colaspis beetle12 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Hop vine borer | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Lesser cornstalk borer | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Seedcorn beetle and slender seedcorn beetle | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Sod webworm (multiple species) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
1 Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Wisconsin; 2 Diabrotica barberi, D. virgifera virgifera, D. undecimpunctata howardi, and D. virgifera zeae; 3 May also include cutworms in general (DE, MD); 4 Chinavia hilaris, Euschistus spp., Halyomorpha halys, and Nezara viridula; 5 Rhopalosiphum padi, R. maidis, and Aphis protaphis middletonii; 6 Popillia japonica (immature) and Phyllophaga spp.; 7 Dalbulus maidis (KS). Other states (OK, TX) recorded this insect but attributed losses to corn stunt, the disease vectored by this insect; 8 Nephelodes minians, Feltia jaculifera, Apamea devastator, Euxoa detersa, and Peridroma saucia. May also include Agrotis ipsilon (MD); 9 Choristoneura parallela and Xenotemna pallorana; 10 Overall a mix of species (FL); 11 Chaetopsis massayla, Euxesta annonae, E. eluta, and E. stigmatias; and 12 Colaspis brunnea and Colaspis crinicornis.
Figure 2. Corn earworm was estimated to reduce overall yield in the U.S. by 47.7 million bushels in 2024, and ranked as the third greatest invertebrate cause of corn yield loss.
Adam Sisson, Iowa State University
Figure 3. Common name and relative proportion of estimated yield losses for invertebrate pests of corn in 2024. The category ‘Others’ includes all species listed in Table 1 with the exception of the 10 highlighted here.
Invertebrate Pests by Production Region
The states reporting data from the western corn-growing region accounted for 72.2 percent of corn production in the U.S. and Ontario. Corn rootworms caused the most injury in this region (Table 2), due to the high amount of intensive continuous corn and Bt-resistant rootworm populations. Western bean cutworm, corn earworms, and mites caused the greatest estimated yield losses after corn rootworm.
The states reporting data from the Great Lakes region accounted for 19.0 percent of corn production in the U.S. and Ontario. Like the western region, corn rootworm caused the greatest estimated yield loss (Table 3); however, the next greatest causes of yield losses differ entirely in the Great Lakes region. In descending order, slugs, Asiatic garden beetle, black cutworm, and true armyworm caused the next greatest losses. In this region, it is estimated that 1.6 percent of corn yield was lost due to invertebrate activity.
The states reporting data for the southern region represented 7.5 percent of the total corn produced in the U.S. and Ontario in 2024. Overall, losses due to corn invertebrate pests across southern states were very low (1.1 percent) (Table 4) compared to the western corn-growing region (4.8 percent) in 2024. Twospotted spider mite caused the greatest yield loss in the southern states, followed by stink bugs, Banks grass mite, corn rootworms, and southwestern corn borer.
Table 2. Estimated corn yield losses due to the five most-significant invertebrates in western corn-growing U.S. states1 in 2024.
Rank | Invertebrate pest | Total losses (thousands of bushels) | |
---|---|---|---|
Region | Overall | ||
1 | 1 | Corn rootworms2 | 318,951.9 |
2 | 2 | Western bean cutworm | 93,527.9 |
3 | 3 | Corn earworm | 46,532.1 |
4 | 4 | Twospotted spider mite | 31,685.4 |
5 | 5 | Banks grass mite | 20,958.1 |
1 Colorado, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota; and 2 Diabrotica barberi, D. virgifera virgifera, and D. undecimpunctata howardi.
Table 3. Estimated corn yield losses due to the five most-significant invertebrates in the Great Lakes region of the U.S. and Ontario, Canada1 in 2024.
Rank | Invertebrate pest | Total losses (thousands of bushels) | |
---|---|---|---|
Region | Overall | ||
1 | 1 | Corn rootworms2 | 26,183.4 |
2 | 9 | Slugs | 6,036.4 |
3 | 10 | Asiatic garden beetle | 4,625.2 |
4 | 7 | Black cutworm | 2,368.5 |
5 | 11 | True armyworm | 2,131.0 |
1 Indiana, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Ontario, Canada; and 2 Diabrotica barberi, D. virgifera virgifera, and D. undecimpunctata howardi.
Table 4. Estimated corn yield losses due to the five most-significant invertebrates in southern U.S. states1 in 2024.
Rank | Invertebrate Pest | Total losses (thousands of bushels) | |
---|---|---|---|
Region | Overall | ||
1 | 4 | Twospotted spider mite | 3,633.8 |
2 | 8 | Stink bugs2 | 2,936.8 |
3 | 5 | Banks grass mite | 1,613.3 |
4 | 1 | Corn rootworms3 | 1,123.5 |
5 | 13 | Southwestern corn borer | 1,058.0 |
1 Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia; 2 Chinavia hilaris, Euschistus spp., Halyomorpha halys, and Nezara viridula; and 3 Diabrotica barberi, D. virgifera virgifera, D. undecimpunctata howardi, and D. virgifera zeae.
Disclaimer
The invertebrate pest loss estimates in this publication were provided primarily by extension specialists across the U.S. and Ontario, Canada. This information is only a guide. The values in this publication are not intended to be exact measures of corn yield losses due to invertebrate pests since they were not quantitatively measured. Participants assume no liability resulting from the use of these estimates. Hence, these losses should be approached with caution when examined for a particular state. However, they can be useful to compare general trends across years or regions within a given year. Values reported in this document were accurate as of the publication date and do not reflect corrections or updates occurring since that time.
Acknowledgments
Data Compilation
Dominic Reisig, North Carolina State University and Adam Sisson, Iowa State University.
Authors
Dominic Reisig, North Carolina State University; Scott Graham, Auburn University; Nick Bateman and Glenn Studebaker, University of Arkansas; Ron Meyer, Colorado State University; Francis Reay-Jones, Clemson University; Ken Wise, Cornell University; David Owens, University of Delaware; Isaac Esquivel, University of Florida; G. David Buntin, University of Georgia; Jocelyn Smith, University of Guelph; Nick Seiter, University of Illinois; Adam Sisson, Iowa State University; Anthony Zukoff, Kansas State University; Raul Villanueva, University of Kentucky; Dawson Kerns, LSU AgCenter; Kelly Hamby, University of Maryland; Chris DiFonzo, Michigan State University; Fei Yang, University of Minnesota; Whitney Crow and Tyler Towles, Mississippi State University; Chase Floyd, University of Missouri; Pin-Chu Lai and Julie Peterson, University of Nebraska; Patrick Beauzay and Janet Knodel, North Dakota State University; Ashleigh Faris, Oklahoma State University; Christian Krupke, Purdue University; Kelley Tilmon, Ohio State University; Tracey Baute, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Agriculture; Adam Varenhorst, South Dakota State University; Sebe Brown, University of Tennessee; David Kerns and Pat Porter, Texas A&M University; Tim Bryant, Virginia Tech; and Emily Bick, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Reviewers
Daren Mueller, Iowa State University and Kiersten Wise, University of Kentucky
Production data from the United States Department of Agriculture-National Agriculture Statistics Service and Statistics Canada.
United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service. Quick Stats Database. Accessed 19 January 2024.
Statistics Canada. Table 32-10-0042-01. Estimated areas, yield, production of corn for grain and soybeans, using genetically modified seed, in metric and imperial units. Accessed 19 January 2024.
Sponsors
In addition to support from United States Department of Agriculture - National Institute of Food and Agriculture, this project was partly funded by the National Corn Growers Association and the Grain Farmers of Ontario through the Sustainable Canadian Agricultural Partnership (Sustainable CAP), a federal-provincial territorial initiative.
This publication was developed by the Crop Protection Network, a multi-state and international collaboration of university/provincial extension specialists and public/ private professionals that provides unbiased, research-based information to farmers and agricultural personnel. This information in this publication is only a guide, and the authors assume no liability for practices implemented based on this information. Reference to products in this publication is not intended to be an endorsement to the exclusion of others that may be similar. Individuals using such products assume responsibility for their use in accordance with current directions of the manufacturer.
In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the State or local Agency that administers the program or contact USDA through the Telecommunications Relay Service at 711 (voice and TTY). Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Mail Stop 9410, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov.
This work is supported by the Crop Protection and Pest Management Extension Implementation Program from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
©2025 by the Crop Protection Network. All rights reserved.
