An Overview of Cercospora Leaf Blight of Soybean
Published: 01/09/2025
DOI: doi.org/10.31274/cpn-20250110-0
cpn-1030
Introduction
Cercospora leaf blight (CLB), caused by multiple species of Cercospora fungi, is an important soybean disease, particularly in the southern United States. This foliar disease can cause premature defoliation and yield loss. Historically, CLB was attributed to infections by C. kikuchii, but C. flagellaris has been reported to be the dominant species based on a recent sampling of symptomatic soybean plants from a large area stretching from Texas east to Alabama and north to Missouri and Kentucky. The main species causing CLB in other areas is not well understood. Additional species associated with CLB in the U.S. include C. alchemillicola, C. iranica, and C. sigesbeckiae, and a previously unidentified species of Cercospora.
Symptoms and Signs
Symptoms of CLB usually are not observed until beginning seed (R5) or later, and symptoms may not appear at the same time. Small, purplish specks (Figure 1) may be visible on leaflets in the upper canopy. As the disease progresses, the upper canopy of the soybean plant will develop a bronze to purple coloration, and the leaves develop a leathery feel (Figure 2). Purple lesions may develop on the petioles (Figure 3). As the disease progresses, brown necrosis (blighting) may occur on leaflets along with a grayish hue that is attributed to sporulation of the fungi that cause CLB (Figure 4). In severe situations, or on an extremely susceptible variety, petioles, the main stem, and pods can all develop a dark purple coloration. The fungi associated with CLB have also been associated with purple seed stain (Figure 5).
Figure 1. Initial symptoms of Cercospora leaf blight are small, purplish specks on leaflets in the upper canopy.
Chris Ward
Figure 2. As the disease progresses, the upper canopy of the soybean plant will develop a bronze to purple coloration, and the leaves develop a leathery feel.
Trey Price, LSU AgCenter
Figure 3. Purple lesions may develop on soybean petioles.
Trey Price, LSU AgCenter
Figure 4. As disease progresses, brown necrosis may occur on leaflets along with a grayish hue attributed to fungal sporulation.
Trey Price, LSU AgCenter
Figure 5. Purple seed stain on soybean seed. The fungi associated with Cercospora leaf blight have also been associated with purple seed stain.
Trey Price, LSU AgCenter
Conditions that Favor Disease
Hot (68 to 86 F) and humid (at least 92.5%) conditions with prolonged dew periods (8 to 24 hours) favor the development of CLB. Rainfall and wind can disperse spores and result in secondary infections (Figure 6). The fungi can also reproduce on additional crop and weed hosts (corn, cotton, pokeweed, ragweed, others) and survive on previous crop residue, which contributes to the inoculum for the subsequent cropping season. Late-planted soybean may have a greater risk of CLB due to the higher inoculum levels being present later in the season. Later planted and later maturing susceptible soybean varieties are more apt to develop CLB. Infected seeds may provide additional inoculum at planting.
Figure 6. Disease cycle of Cercospora leaf blight on soybean.
Yield Losses and Impact
Yield losses due to CLB can range from mild to severe. Fields can be completely defoliated under weather conditions favorable for the disease, although this is rare. The annual yield loss estimates compiled by plant pathologists throughout the U.S. soybean production system indicate that the estimated losses occurring between 2013 and 2023 ranged from $46 to $166 million.
Diagnosis
Since multiple symptoms are attributable to CLB and it can be confused with other problems, diagnosis can be challenging in the field. Symptoms can vary with location and variety, further confounding diagnosis. Extension pathologists can help with CLB identification and/or samples can be sent to diagnostic laboratories to confirm the presence of CLB pathogens.
Diseases, Disorders, and Injury with Similar Symptoms
Cercospora leaf blight can be confused with other diseases and disorders. We describe the most common of these below and in Table 1.
Diseases
Target spot (Corynespora cassiicola) – Target spot infects various soybean plant parts. Initially considered minor, it now causes significant defoliation in susceptible varieties across the southern United States. Lesions are reddish-brown and round to irregular with yellow halos and may contain a concentric ring pattern (Figure 7). Severe infections lead to defoliation, beginning in the lower canopy. Stem and petiole lesions are dark brown and can be confused with CLB lesions (Figure 8).
How to distinguish Target spot from CLB: Petiole lesions caused by target spot generally are first observed in the lower canopy while CLB petiole lesions are initially observed in the upper canopy. Concentric ring patterns in lesions are present in target spot but absent in CLB. The presence of foliar symptoms in conjunction with petiole lesions in the lower canopy indicate target spot. Moreover, lesions associated with target spot tend to be smaller and not confined to the petiole.
Figure 7. Foliar symptoms of target spot.
Trey Price, LSU AgCenter
Figure 8. Stem lesions of target spot.
Trey Price, LSU AgCenter
Frogeye leaf spot (Cercospora sojina) – Frogeye leaf spot (FLS) is characterized by the small gray lesions with reddish-brown borders on upper leaf surfaces. Lesions start dark and water-soaked, enlarging over time. Severe cases lead to premature leaf drop and can spread to stems and pods. The fungus that causes frogeye leaf spot may also cause purple petiole lesions (Figure 9) and infect seed.
Figure 9. Purple petiole lesions of frogeye leaf spot.
Trey Price, LSU AgCenter
How to distinguish frogeye leaf spot from CLB: The foliar phase of FLS is usually severe and easily distinguishable from CLB when FLS petiole lesions occur. The seed stain caused by C. sojina (the causal agent of FLS) is light purple to gray, while seed infection by CLB pathogens results in a royal purple color.
Injury
Chloride toxicity – Chloride toxicity symptoms in soybeans include leaf tip scorching, premature yellowing, bronzing of leaves, and leaf loss that may resemble CLB.
How to distinguish chloride toxicity from CLB: Chloride toxicity injury typically manifests along leaflet margins as chlorosis and necrosis, while CLB can occur anywhere on leaflets.
Sunburn – Sunburn, also known as sunscald, appears as brick-red discoloration between veins of soybean leaves. This condition primarily affects the lower leaf surface, distinguishing it from CLB, which causes discoloration on the upper leaf surface. Injury occasionally can be seen on pods.
How to distinguish sunburn from CLB: Sunburn is typically on the lower leaf surface, while CLB is predominately on the upper leaf surface.
Disease/Injury | Symptom Distribution | Symptom Expression |
---|---|---|
Cercospora leaf blight | Anywhere on upper leaf surface; upper canopy | Small, purplish specks turning to leaf bronzing; leaf loss |
Target spot | Lower canopy | Red-brown lesions with yellow halos; may show concentric rings; leaf loss |
Frogeye leaf spot | Upper leaf surface | Small, gray lesions with red margins; leaf loss |
Chloride toxicity | Usually along leaf margins | Leaf tip scorching; leaf yellowing and bronzing; leaf loss |
Sunburn | Upper and lower leaf surface, pods | Brick-red discoloration between leaf veins |
Table 1. Symptom distribution and expression for diseases and disorders with symptoms similar to Cercospora leaf blight.
Management
Soybean varieties with resistance to CLB may be available, and farmers should plant varieties that have been evaluated near their farm. Since the fungi that cause CLB can overwinter on soybean residue, rotation and/or tillage may reduce disease incidence.
Managing CLB mainly relies on using foliar fungicides from multiple fungicide classes, and applying them at appropriate reproductive growth stages. However, QoI (Group 11) and MBC (Group 3) fungicides are likely no longer effective in managing CLB since widespread QoI resistance within the CLB pathogen populations has been confirmed in eight states. However, some SDHI (Group 7) and DMI (Group 3) premixes applied from beginning pod to beginning seed (R3-R5) using appropriate rates and water volumes (10-15 gallons per acre) are still effective. Please refer to the most recent Fungicide Efficacy for Control of Soybean Foliar Diseases for more information.
Acknowledgements
Authors
Trey Price, LSU AgCenter; Tom Allen, Mississippi State University; Vinson Doyle, LSU AgCenter; Travis Faske, University of Arkansas; Daren Mueller, Iowa State University; Boyd Padgett, LSU AgCenter; Adam Sisson, Iowa State University; Terry Spurlock, University of Arkansas; Sara Thomas-Sharma, LSU AgCenter; Chris Ward, Louisiana Consultant; and Tessie Wilkerson, Mississippi State University.
Reviewers
Gary Bergstrom, Cornell University; Martin Chilvers, University of Michigan; Maira Duffeck, Oklahoma State University; David Langston, University of Virginia; Dean Malvick, University of Minnesota; Richard Webster, North Dakota State University; and Kiersten Wise, University of Kentucky.
Sponsors
Many Cercospora leaf blight management projects have been funded by the United Soybean Board, Mid-South Soybean Board, and respective state commodity boards. The authors thank soybean farmers across the nation for their support.
Click the link below to access the CCA CEU quiz.
An Overview of Cercospora Leaf Blight of Soybean [CCA CEU Quiz]
This publication was developed by the Crop Protection Network, a multi-state and international collaboration of university/provincial extension specialists and public/ private professionals that provides unbiased, research-based information to farmers and agricultural personnel. This information in this publication is only a guide, and the authors assume no liability for practices implemented based on this information. Reference to products in this publication is not intended to be an endorsement to the exclusion of others that may be similar. Individuals using such products assume responsibility for their use in accordance with current directions of the manufacturer.
In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the State or local Agency that administers the program or contact USDA through the Telecommunications Relay Service at 711 (voice and TTY). Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Mail Stop 9410, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov.
This work is supported by the Crop Protection and Pest Management Extension Implementation Program from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
©2025 by the Crop Protection Network. All rights reserved.
