An Overview of Soybean Vein Necrosis Virus
Published: 05/01/2015
DOI: doi.org/10.31274/cpn-20190620-025
CPN-1003
Soybean farmers should be aware of a new disease caused by soybean vein necrosis virus (SVNV). The virus has likely been in soybeans for some time, but was probably overlooked or misdiagnosed before recent detections. The disease has been detected across the United States (including many states in the North Central region) and in Ontario, Canada.
SVNV is a Tospovirus, a group of viruses capable of causing serious damage in many different crops. The long-term implications of this disease are not yet known, and we are currently working to better understand the disease and potential for yield loss in soybean. Accurately diagnosing SVNV is important, especially because it can easily be confused with other soybean diseases, disorders, or damage.
This publication examines the symptoms of SVNV, describes how SVNV differs from several other plant problems that may look like SVNV, and provides scouting information.
Symptoms
SVNV symptoms are typically randomly distributed throughout the canopy. SVNV lesions start as a yellowing (chlorosis) along the leaf vein. Over time, yellowing becomes red-brown, irregular-shaped lesions, and eventually leads to tissue death (Figures 1 and 2). The yellowing around the lesion may begin to spread beyond the vein but will typically be limited to the area within other major leaf veins. The symptoms are generally not uniform across the leaf.
Figure 1. Early SVNV symptoms include yellowing tissue around leaf veins.
Figure 2. As SVNV progresses, the irregular-shaped lesions become red-brown and leaf tissue begins to die.
Leaf tissue will die following chlorosis. Lesions typically spread along or from the edge of a vein. The lesions range from 1⁄4 to 1⁄2 inch (6 to 12 mm) but can be larger (Figure 3). In affected plants, the veins may appear clear, yellow, or dark brown. Vein discoloration may be especially noticeable on the undersides of leaves (Figure 4).
Although there is little information about soybean varietal response to SVNV, differences in symptoms may be caused by soybean thrips (the insect vector of this disease), which may prefer certain cultivars.
Figure 3. These SVNV lesions have yellow margins that spread from leaf veins.
Figure 4. The underside of this soybean leaf shows vein discoloration from SVNV.
Conditions With Similar Symptoms
Diseases
Several diseases can be confused with SVNV — we describe the seven most commonly confused diseases below. It is important to accurately diagnose SVNV to prevent unwarranted management decisions that will not work against this disease.
Figure 5. Brown spot causes dark lesions in the lower canopy.
Figure 6. Leaves with brown spot can begin to yellow and fall from the plant early.
Figure 7. Yellow halos surround these small, angular bacterial blight lesions.
Figure 8. When bacterial blight lesions die, the tissue separates and the leaves appear tattered.
Figure 9. Bacterial pustule lesions have reddish brown centers.
Figure 10. A magnified bacterial pustule on the underside of a leaf.
Figure 11. Cercospora leaf blight results in mottled, purple to orange discoloration of the leaf.
Figure 12. Light green to yellow downy mildew lesions form on leaves in the upper canopy.
Figure 13. Fuzzy growth on the undersides of leaves is a characteristic symptom of downy mildew.
Figure 14. Symptoms of Phyllosticta leaf spot on soybean include irregular lesions with narrow, dark margins.
Figure 15. Yellow or dead leaf tissue between veins is a symptom of SDS infection.
Figure 16. Early symptoms of SDS include leaf yellowing, which can be confused with SVNV.
Herbicide Damage
SVNV can also be confused with herbicide damage from ALS inhibitor and ACCase inhibitor herbicides.
Figure 17. ALS inhibitor herbicides can cause leaf veins to turn red, similar to SVNV.
Figure 18. The ACCase inhibitor herbicide quizalofop can cause injury along the veins of soybean leaves, making it difficult to differentiate from SVNV symptoms.
Vectors and SVNV
Tospoviruses are transmitted by a group of insects called thrips. To date, as many as 14 thrips species are known to be vectors of tospoviruses, but only a smaller subset of these are likely vectors of SVNV. Soybean thrips (Neohydatothrips variabilis) have recently been confirmed as a vector of SVNV and additional investigation may reveal other vector species.
Adult thrips are barely visible to the unaided eye (Figure 19). The insect feeds with a rasping-sucking mouthpart that leaves small, dash-like scars on leaves. Thrips development depends on temperature and adult females can survive for three to five weeks.
When nymphs emerge from eggs (Figure 20), they can acquire SVNV by feeding on an infected source plant. After pupation, infected adults spread the virus to addi- tional plants. If the virus is acquired by adult thrips, transmission to additional plants is not possible as the virus can only complete its lifecycle when acquired by immature thrips.
Eggs from an infected adult do not carry the virus, but the virus may be capable of overwintering in living host weeds and within thrips migrating from the South.
Figure 19. Adult thrips are very small and slender.
Figure 20. Thrips nymphs acquire SVNV when feeding on infected plants.
Laboratory Detection
Confirming virus infection is difficult since virus diseases often resemble other foliar diseases or disorders such as herbicide injury or nutrient imbalances. The only way to positively confirm a diagnosis of SVNV (or any virus) is through laboratory testing. The virus is easier to detect in leaf samples with early disease symptoms. Once lesions have turned from yellow to brown, it is difficult to detect the virus in symptomatic tissue. Contact your state’s land-grant university or private diagnostic lab for pricing and sampling procedures.
Yield Loss, Economic Impact, Management
If SVNV will limit yields, growers may consider treating soybean with an insecticide to reduce thrips populations; however, we do not currently recommend insecticide applications in response to SVNV detection since vector control of other insect-transmitted diseases has not typically been successful.
Researchers will continue to monitor this disease and assess its potential impact in an effort to determine the best management options. Future recommendations will be developed as we learn more about this disease.
Earn Certified Crop Advisor CEUs
Successfully complete a quiz for this publication to earn 0.5 CCA CEUs here.
Acknowledgments
Authors
Chris Bloomingdale, University of Wisconsin; Carl Bradley, University of Illinois; Martin Chilvers, Michigan State University; Loren Giesler, University of Nebraska; Russ Groves, University of Wisconsin; Daren Mueller, Iowa State University; Damon Smith, University of Wisconsin; Albert Tenuta, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food; and Kiersten Wise, Purdue University.
Contributors
Emmanuel Byamukama, South Dakota State University; Anne Dorrance, Ohio State University; Doug Jardine, Kansas State University; Dean Malvick, University of Minnesota; Sam Markell, North Dakota State University; Punya Nachappa, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne; Adam Sisson, Iowa State University; Laura Sweets, University of Missouri.
All photos were provided by and are the property of the authors and contributors except: Figure 10 by Alison Robertson, Iowa State University and Figure 18 by Paul Bachi, University of Kentucky Research and Education Center.
This content was originally published as Soybean Disease Management: Soybean Vein Necrosis Virus in 2014 as Purdue Extension publication BP-186.
Sponsors
The Soybean Disease Management series is a multi-state collaboration sponsored by the North Central Soybean Research Program (NCSRP) through the Soybean Checkoff. This project was funded in part through Growing Forward 2 (GF2), a federal-provincial territorial initiative. The Agricultural Adaptation Council assists in the delivery of GF2 in Ontario. The authors thank the United States Department of Agriculture - National Institute of Food and Agriculture, the Grain Farmers of Ontario, and United Soybean Board for their support. Contributors to this series come from land-grant universities in the North Central states and Canada.
This information in this publication is only a guide, and the authors assume no liability for practices implemented based on this information. Reference to products in this publication is not intended to be an endorsement to the exclusion of others that may be similar. Individuals using such products assume responsibility for their use in accordance with current directions of the manufacturer.
This publication was developed by the Crop Protection Network, a multi-state and international collaboration of university/provincial extension specialists and public/ private professionals that provides unbiased, research-based information to farmers and agricultural personnel.
Click the link below to access the CCA CEU quiz.
This publication was developed by the Crop Protection Network, a multi-state and international collaboration of university/provincial extension specialists and public/ private professionals that provides unbiased, research-based information to farmers and agricultural personnel. This information in this publication is only a guide, and the authors assume no liability for practices implemented based on this information. Reference to products in this publication is not intended to be an endorsement to the exclusion of others that may be similar. Individuals using such products assume responsibility for their use in accordance with current directions of the manufacturer.
In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
©2024 by the Crop Protection Network. All rights reserved.