Soybean Disease Loss Estimates From the United States and Ontario, Canada — 2020
Published: 12/31/2020
DOI: doi.org/10.31274/cpn-20210607-2
CPN-1018-20
Each year, soybean diseases reduce yield in the United States and Ontario, Canada. The importance of these diseases varies annually, and many factors influence which diseases significantly affect yield. These factors can include environment, production practices, and a variety’s susceptibility to disease.
The current publication provides the estimated annual soybean yield losses due to plant diseases and pathogens in 2020 for the major soybean-producing areas in the United States and Ontario, Canada. Extension, university, USDA plant pathologists and soybean specialists from each state and province provided the estimates. These reports accounted for 99.9 percent of the total soybean production in the United States and Ontario in 2020. The estimated losses include those caused by foliar diseases, stem diseases, nematodes, seedling blights, and diseases of harvested grain.
Disease loss estimates are gathered through various means including disease surveys; interactions with Extension, university, government, industry, and farmer representatives; and personal experience with disease losses. Estimation methods vary by state or province.
For this publication, the authors determined disease loss values based on yield before estimated losses for each state or province using this formula:
(harvested bushels/[{100 – percent estimated disease loss}/100])
The authors then formulated the total number of bushels lost for each disease ([percent loss/100] x yield before estimated loss) for each state or province.
Additional information on yield and economic losses due to soybean diseases can be found at the CPN Field Crop Disease Loss Calculator.
2020 Production
The United States produced more than 4.1 billion bushels of soybean in 2020, an increase of nearly 0.6 billion bushels from 2019. Ontario, Canada, produced 143.6 million bushels in 2020.
Figure 1. 2020 soybean production (in millions of bushels) from 29 U.S. states and Ontario, Canada.
Figure 2. Seedling diseases, such as those caused by Pythium species (shown here), were estimated to have caused more than 22 million bushels of yield losses in 2020 in the United States and Ontario.
Marty Chilvers
2020 Disease Losses
In all, 5.0 percent of the potential estimated soybean production (bushels/acre) in 2020 was lost due to disease in the top 29 soybean-producing states, and 9.1 percent of the total estimated soybean production in 2020 was lost due to disease in Ontario, Canada. Table 1 provides yield loss estimates for the specific diseases included in the survey of plant pathologists throughout the soybean production system in the U.S. and Ontario, Canada. Estimated percent losses in 2020 were less than those reported during either of the preceding two years.
Table 1. Estimated soybean yield losses from diseases in 29 soybean producing states in the United States and Ontario, Canada in 2020, listed in order of most losses to least losses in each disease category.
Disease | Total US losses (thousands of bushels) | Total Ontario losses (thousands of bushels) |
Root Rots and Seedling Blights | ||
Soybean cyst nematode | 87,353 | 5,529 |
Seedling diseases due to Fusarium, Pythium, Phomopsis, and Rhizoctonia | 22,065 | 2,369 |
Root-knot nematode | 10,398 | 0 |
Taproot decline | 1,941 | 0 |
Reniform nematode | 1,550 | 0 |
Other nematodes¹ | 1,129 | 79 |
Leaf and Aboveground Diseases | ||
Cercospora leaf blight | 7,599 | 16 |
Frogeye leaf spot | 6,612 | 16 |
Septoria brown spot | 5,563 | 158 |
Soybean rust | 1,628 | 0 |
Purple seed stain² | 1,323 | 16 |
Rhizoctonia aerial blight | 1,162 | 0 |
Target spot | 708 | 0 |
Virus diseases³ | 443 | 2 |
Bacterial diseases | 114 | 16 |
Downy mildew | 98 | 0 |
Stem Diseases | ||
Sudden death syndrome | 20,055 | 3,159 |
Phytophthora root and stem rot | 16,701 | 1,975 |
Charcoal rot | 8,623 | 32 |
Sclerotinia stem rot (White mold) | 7,885 | 395 |
Pod and stem blight | 5,226 | 16 |
Stem canker | 3,040 | 158 |
Southern blight | 1,969 | 0 |
Diaporthe (Phomopsis) seed decay4 | 1,851 | 158 |
Brown stem rot | 1,315 | 79 |
Anthracnose | 968 | 16 |
Fusarium wilt and root rot | 341 | 158 |
Other Diseases | ||
Other diseases5 | 12 | 0 |
¹Lance, root lesion, sting, and stubby root. Only root lesion nematode was reported in Ontario, Canada; ²A portion of the estimated yield loss value for purple seed stain in the U.S. is due to dockage from low quality seed reported from New York; ³Bean pod mottle, soybean mosaic, soybean vein necrosis, tobacco ringspot, and tobacco streak. Only soybean mosaic was reported in Ontario, Canada; 4A portion of the estimated yield loss value for Diaporthe (Phomopsis) seed decay in the U.S. is due to dockage from low quality seed reported from North Carolina and New York. The estimated yield loss value for Diaporthe (Phomopsis) seed decay from Ontario is due to dockage from low quality seed; 5Phymatotrichopsis root rot and red crown rot
Diseases in the Northern United States
The northern states in the U.S., which included Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, and Wisconsin, accounted for 66.0 percent of the total estimated yield losses in 2020. Because three-quarters of U.S. soybean production occurs in the northern states, disease losses in these states greatly affect the overall importance of different diseases across the country (see Table 2). However, drought conditions in soybean production areas in 2020 likely resulted in less disease loss than is normal in the northern region.
Table 2. Estimated soybean yield losses due to the seven most significant diseases in the northernmost U.S. states¹ in 2020.
Rank | Disease/Pathogen | Total losses (thousands of bushels) | |
Northern Region | Nation | ||
1 | 1 | Soybean cyst nematode | 70,403 |
2 | 2 | Seedling diseases due to Fusarium, Pythium, Phomopsis, and Rhizoctonia | 15,335 |
3 | 3 | Sudden death syndrome | 14,551 |
4 | 4 | Phytophthora root and stem rot | 12,414 |
5 | 7 | Sclerotinia stem rot (White mold) | 7,884 |
6 | 6 | Charcoal rot | 7,439 |
7 | 9 | Frogeye leaf spot | 4,427 |
¹Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, and Wisconsin
Figure 3. Frogeye leaf spot was the only foliar disease among the top yield-reducing diseases in the northern U.S. in 2020.
Carl Bradley
Diseases in the Southern United States
Soybean cyst nematode, root-knot nematode, and Cercospora leaf blight were the three diseases of greatest importance in 2020 in the southernmost U.S., which included Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia (see Table 3).
Table 3. Estimated soybean yield losses due to the seven most significant diseases in the southernmost U.S. states¹ in 2020.
Rank | Disease/Pathogen | Total losses (thousands of bushels) | |
Southern Region | Nation | ||
1 | 1 | Soybean cyst nematode | 16,950 |
2 | 5 | Root-knot nematode | 10,358 |
3 | 8 | Cercospora leaf blight | 7,551 |
4 | 2 | Seedling diseases due to Fusarium, Pythium, Phomopsis, and Rhizoctonia | 6,730 |
5 | 3 | Sudden death syndrome | 5,504 |
6 | 4 | Phytophthora root and stem rot | 4,287 |
7 | 10 | Septoria brown spot | 2,958 |
¹Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia
Diseases in Ontario, Canada
Similar to 2019, soybean cyst nematode caused the greatest estimated yield loss in Ontario, Canada, in 2020, followed by sudden death syndrome and seedling diseases (see Table 4). There were no foliar diseases present among the top yield-reducing diseases in Ontario.
Table 4. Estimated soybean yield losses due to the seven most significant diseases in Ontario, Canada in 2020.
Rank | Disease/Pathogen | Total losses (thousands of bushels) | |
Ontario, Canada | United States | ||
1 | 1 | Soybean cyst nematode | 5,529 |
2 | 3 | Sudden death syndrome | 3,159 |
3 | 2 | Seedling diseases due to Fusarium, Pythium, Phomopsis, and Rhizoctonia | 2,369 |
4 | 4 | Phytophthora root and stem rot | 1,975 |
5 | 7 | Sclerotinia stem rot (White mold) | 395 |
6a | 15 | Diaporthe (Phomopsis) seed decay | 158 |
6b | 25 | Fusarium wilt and root rot | 158 |
Disclaimer
The yield losses estimated in this publication were provided by members of the North Central Research and Extension Activity (NCERA) 137 Soybean Disease Committee and the Southern Soybean Disease Workers. The information contained in the current publication is meant to be used as a guide. The values in this publication are estimates and are not intended to be used as exact measurements of soybean yield losses due to plant diseases. However, these data provide valuable insight into the ranking of importance of a given disease within a production region (north or south) as well as across the entire production system. The most appropriate means available were used to estimate disease losses and no liability resulting from the use of these estimates is assumed.
Values reported in this document were accurate as of publication date and do not reflect corrections or updates occurring since that time. For the most up-to-date values and additional information on yield and economic losses due to diseases, see the Field Crop Disease Loss Calculator at https://loss.cropprotectionnetwork.org/.
Acknowledgments
Authors
Carl Bradley, University of Kentucky; Tom Allen, Mississippi State University; Albert Tenuta, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; Kelsey Mehl, University of Kentucky; and Adam Sisson, Iowa State University.
Contributors
Ed Sikora, Auburn University; Terry Spurlock and Travis Faske, University of Arkansas; Alyssa Koehler, University of Delaware; Nick Dufault, University of Florida; Bob Kemerait, University of Georgia; Nathan Kleczewski, University of Illinois; Darcy Telenko, Purdue University; Daren Mueller, Iowa State University; Rodrigo Onofre, Kansas State University; Carl Bradley, University of Kentucky; Trey Price and Boyd Padgett, Louisiana State University; Marty Chilvers and Fred Warner, Michigan State University; Dean Malvick and James Kurle, University of Minnesota; Tom Allen, Mississippi State University; Kaitlyn Bissonnette, University of Missouri; Tamra Jackson-Ziems, University of Nebraska; Gary Bergstrom, Cornell University; Lindsey Thiessen, North Carolina State University; Samuel Markell and Berlin Nelson, North Dakota State University; Anne Dorrance, The Ohio State University; John Damicone, Oklahoma State University; Albert Tenuta, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; Alyssa Collins and Paul Esker, Pennsylvania State University; John Mueller, Clemson University; Emmanuel Byamukama and Connie Tande, South Dakota State University; Heather Kelly, University of Tennessee; Tom Isakeit, Texas A&M University; Hillary Mehl, Virginia Tech; and Damon Smith, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Sponsors
The authors thank the United Soybean Board and the Grain Farmers of Ontario for their support. Support also was provided by State and Federal Funds appropriated to the State Land Grant Institutions of cooperating authors and the United States Department of Agriculture - National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA-NIFA).
This publication was developed by the Crop Protection Network, a multi-state and international collaboration of university/provincial extension specialists and public/ private professionals that provides unbiased, research-based information to farmers and agricultural personnel. This information in this publication is only a guide, and the authors assume no liability for practices implemented based on this information. Reference to products in this publication is not intended to be an endorsement to the exclusion of others that may be similar. Individuals using such products assume responsibility for their use in accordance with current directions of the manufacturer.
In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
©2024 by the Crop Protection Network. All rights reserved.
![We are extension logo](/img/containers/s3/WeAreExtension2.jpg/c581bb94eba8a1841fb8eeb2ea76e925.jpg)