Soybean Invertebrate Loss Estimates from the United States — 2023
Published: 08/07/2024
DOI: doi.org/10.31274/cpn-20240812-0
CPN-1029-23
Soybean invertebrate pests (insects, mites, and mollusks) annually reduce yield and require economic investment to manage in the United States. Pest importance varies yearly, and pest development and yield loss are based on many factors, including weather conditions, crop production practices, and variety selection and susceptibility to pests. This publication documents the estimated yield loss caused by invertebrate pests and the economic expenditures on pest management efforts, such as foliar insecticide application, insecticide seed treatment, and field scouting.
Public sector entomologists and other specialists in 19 soybean-producing states estimated the percent yield loss caused by and management costs associated with invertebrate pests in their respective states. The reporting states account for 2.6 billion bushels (62.6 percent) of the total soybean produced in the United States in 2023. The relative proportion of bushels produced in states reporting data is shown in Figure 1. The yield loss estimates include pests that injure roots, stems, leaves, and pods. In 2023, Missouri and Maryland began submitting data, while Oklahoma did not provide data as in previous years.
Figure 1. Relative proportion of soybean bushels produced in states reporting invertebrate loss estimates in 2023. These states represent 62.6 percent of the soybean production in the United States in 2023. The “Other States” category includes Alabama, Delaware, Georgia, Maryland, South Carolina, Texas, and Virginia.
Figure 2. Multiple species of stink bugs reduced soybean yields by an estimated 12.6 million bushels among states reporting data in 2023. Additionally, stink bug management efforts in soybean were estimated to have cost more than $78.1 million USD.
Crop Protection Network
This publication documents the impact of invertebrate pests on soybean production during 2023, based on yield loss estimates and management costs supplied by state specialists, alone or in consultation with Extension educators or industry employees. Invertebrate loss values were derived using yield before losses in individual states. The at-planting preventative management cost (use of a neonicotinoid seed treatment, NST) was determined by multiplying the number of acres treated by the per acre cost of an NST. Scouting costs were determined the same way, using a per-acre cost for scouting. In-season management costs (replanting a damaged stand or applying a foliar insecticide) were determined by multiplying the cost of a single treatment by the number of acres treated. When acres were sprayed more than once, each application counted as an acre treated. Data on planted acres, price, and production were obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture – National Agricultural Statistics Service.
2023 Invertebrate Pest Losses
The United States produced nearly 4.2 billion bushels of soybean in 2023; the value of this crop was more than $52.8 billion USD. In 2023, invertebrate pests reduced soybean bushels by 1.6 percent across the 19 states reporting data. Additionally, overall management costs (at plant and in-season) were estimated at $669.3 million USD, which includes non-targeted insecticide applications. Stink bugs (Figure 2) reduced yield more than any other invertebrate pest in 2023, followed by corn earworm, soybean looper, bean leaf beetle, and green cloverworm. Table 1 provides numeric yield loss and targeted foliar insecticide application or replanting cost estimates for all invertebrate pests reported in the survey, while Figure 3 visualizes the yield loss proportionally by pest. Table 2 shows per acre estimated management costs by state.
Table 1. Estimated soybean yield losses and costs of applying a targeted foliar insecticide or replanting a damaged stand due to specific invertebrate pests in 19 U.S. states during the 2023 growing season.
Invertebrate Pest | Total Losses (bushels, in thousands) | Targeted Foliar Insecticide Application or Replanting Costs1 (USD, in thousands) |
---|---|---|
Stink bugs (multiple species) | 12,562 | 78,127 |
Corn earworm | 10,910 | 62,177 |
Soybean looper | 3,392 | 36,563 |
Bean leaf beetle | 3,099 | 22,626 |
Green cloverworm | 1,741 | 7,687 |
Threecornered alfalfa hopper | 1,633 | 2,553 |
Slugs (multiple species) | 1,481 | 6,977 |
Dectes stem borer | 1,405 | 1,260 |
Armyworm complex (multiple species) | 1,216 | 7,742 |
Grasshopper | 1,167 | 5,490 |
Japanese beetle | 947 | 10,272 |
Velvetbean caterpillar | 740 | 4,880 |
Spider mites | 672 | 3,449 |
Kudzu bug | 580 | 3,515 |
Saltmarsh caterpillar | 325 | 1,189 |
Spotted cucumber beetle | 211 | 0 |
Cutworms (multiple species) | 192 | 4,634 |
Grape colaspis | 64 | 33 |
Thrips | 54 | 828 |
Blister beetle (multiple species) | 27 | 3,498 |
Soybean aphid | 24 | 503 |
Seedcorn maggot | 22 | 93 |
Mexican bean beetle | 14 | 0 |
Lesser cornstalk borer | 13 | 0 |
Garden webworm | 12 | 179 |
Banded cucumber beetle | 9 | 218 |
Other insects | 2 | 131 |
Potato leafhopper | 1 | 0 |
Soybean gall midge | 0 | 0 |
Thistle caterpillar | 0 | 0 |
1Does not include costs associated with seed treatments, crop scouting, and untargeted foliar insecticide application. The reported value consists primarily of foliar insecticide application but can include replant costs as a result of damage by pests such as slugs and seedcorn maggot.
Figure 3. Common name and relative proportion (%) of estimated yield losses for invertebrate pests in 2023. The “Others” category includes saltmarsh caterpillar, spotted cucumber beetle, cutworms, grape colaspis, thrips, blister beetles, soybean aphid, seedcorn maggot, Mexican bean beetle, lesser cornstalk borer, garden webworm, banded cucumber beetle, potato leafhopper, soybean gall midge, and insects which were listed in the other insect category on the original data sheet.
Table 2. Estimated overall per acre management costs due to invertebrate pests in 19 U.S. soybean-producing states during the 2023 growing season.
State | Per Acre Cost (USD) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Insecticide Seed Treatment | Field Scouting | Foliar Insecticide1/ Replanting | Total | |
Alabama | 3.15 | 3.30 | 9.59 | 16.04 |
Arkansas | 6.40 | 7.65 | 26.81 | 40.86 |
Delaware | 2.34 | 4.16 | 12.52 | 19.03 |
Georgia | 1.60 | 3.00 | 15.76 | 20.36 |
Illinois | 4.40 | 1.05 | 2.93 | 8.38 |
Iowa | 3.30 | 0.93 | 0.86 | 5.09 |
Kentucky | 8.37 | 5.53 | 1.68 | 15.57 |
Louisiana | 5.22 | 5.60 | 27.80 | 38.62 |
Maryland | 2.34 | 4.16 | 12.52 | 19.03 |
Michigan | 6.00 | 0.77 | 0.90 | 7.67 |
Mississippi | 7.20 | 6.11 | 11.52 | 24.83 |
Missouri | 6.00 | 3.75 | 7.53 | 17.28 |
North Carolina | 1.80 | 1.63 | 17.04 | 20.47 |
Ohio | 6.40 | 2.00 | 1.75 | 10.15 |
South Carolina | 6.50 | 2.25 | 27.60 | 36.35 |
Tennessee | 5.60 | 3.38 | 6.30 | 15.28 |
Texas | 11.00 | 2.50 | 10.85 | 24.35 |
Virginia | 3.00 | 3.60 | 14.40 | 21.00 |
Wisconsin | 2.40 | 2.50 | 4.10 | 9.00 |
1 Includes insecticide applications targeted for specific pests and non-targeted applications consisting mainly of a pyrethroid insecticide tank-mixed with a fungicide or herbicide.
Invertebrate Pests in the Southern Region
(Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia)
This region represented 15.6% of the soybean production in the U.S. in 2023. The overall loss due to invertebrate pests in southern states in 2023 was 4.7%, or 31.7 million bushels. Multiple species of stink bugs caused the greatest loss, followed by corn earworm (Table 3). Soybean looper, bean leaf beetle, and threecornered alfalfa hopper caused the next greatest losses in descending order.
Table 3. Estimated soybean yield losses due to the five most significant invertebrate pests in southern soybean growing U.S. states1 in 2023 and associated targeted foliar insecticide costs.
Rank | Invertebrate Pest | Total losses (bushels, in thousands) | Targeted Foliar Insecticide Application Costs (USD, in thousands)2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Southern Region | Nation | |||
1 | 1 | Stink bugs (multiple species) | 11,115 | 67,028 |
2 | 2 | Corn earworm | 9,893 | 52,841 |
3 | 3 | Soybean looper | 3,379 | 35,107 |
4 | 4 | Bean leaf beetle | 1,560 | 12,053 |
5 | 6 | Threecornered alfalfa hopper | 1,092 | 1,468 |
1 Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia
2 Does not include costs associated with seed treatments, crop scouting, and untargeted foliar insecticide application. The reported value consists primarily of foliar insecticide application.
Invertebrate Pests in the Great Lakes Region
(Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin)
This region represented 11.4% of the soybean production in the U.S. in 2023. The overall loss due to invertebrate pests in the Great Lakes region in 2023 was 0.8%, or 3.6 million bushels. Armyworms caused the greatest estimated yield reduction (Table 4). Grasshoppers and Japanese beetle caused the next greatest losses, in descending order.
Table 4. Estimated soybean yield losses due to the five most significant invertebrate pests reported to have caused losses in Great Lakes region U.S. states1 in 2023 and associated targeted foliar insecticide or replanting costs.
Rank | Invertebrate Pest | Total losses (bushels, in thousands) | Targeted Foliar Insecticide Application or Replanting Costs (USD, in thousands)2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Great Lakes | Nation | |||
1 | 9 | Armyworms | 973 | 4,220 |
2 | 10 | Grasshoppers | 865 | 1,688 |
3 | 11 | Japanese beetle | 516 | 3,563 |
4 | 2 | Corn earworm | 432 | 1,055 |
5 | 7 | Slugs | 383 | 2,876 |
1 Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin
2 Does not include costs associated with seed treatments, crop scouting, and untargeted foliar insecticide application. The reported value consists primarily of foliar insecticide application but can include replant costs for some pests such as slugs.
Invertebrate Pests in the Western Region
(Illinois, Iowa, and Missouri)
This region represented 35.7% of the soybean production in the U.S. in 2023. The overall loss due to invertebrate pests in the northern region in 2023 was 0.5%, or 7.2 million bushels. Bean leaf beetle caused the greatest estimated yield reduction, followed by stink bugs, green cloverworm, spider mites, and corn earworm (Table 5).
Table 5. Estimated soybean yield losses due to the five most significant invertebrate pests in western soybean growing U.S. states1 in 2023 and associated targeted foliar insecticide or replanting costs.
Rank | Invertebrate Pest | Total losses (bushels, in thousands) | Targeted Foliar Insecticide Application or Replanting Costs (USD, in thousands)2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Western Region | Nation | |||
1 | 4 | Bean leaf beetle | 1,511 | 10,574 |
2 | 1 | Stink bugs (multiple species) | 1,310 | 7,537 |
3 | 5 | Green cloverworm | 1,036 | 3,105 |
4 | 13 | Spider mites | 661 | 3,159 |
5 | 2 | Corn earworm | 584 | 8,281 |
1 Illinois, Iowa, and Missouri
2 Does not include costs associated with seed treatments, crop scouting, and untargeted foliar insecticide application. The reported value consists primarily of foliar insecticide application but can include replant costs for some pests such as slugs.
Summary
These data are helpful in creating a partial picture of yield losses and economic expenditures caused by invertebrate pests in soybeans. It is limited in that it represents a little more than half of the soybean bushels produced in the U.S., as data were unavailable from several soybean-producing states. However, it does provide a summary of the most important invertebrate pests to soybean production in 2023 for the geography represented. It highlights the impact invertebrate pests have in soybean production, and the differences in key pest species and level of injury from region to region, underscoring the need for continued efforts in crop protection research and education.
Disclaimer
The invertebrate pest loss estimates in this publication were provided by the authors. This information is only a guide. The values in this publication are only estimates of soybean yield losses or economic costs due to invertebrate pests. The authors assume no liability resulting from the use of these estimates.
Values in this document were accurate when reported and do not reflect corrections or updates occurring since that time. For the most up-to-date values and additional information on yield and economic losses due to invertebrate pests, see the Field Crop Disease and Insect Loss Calculator.
References
Data used in this publication will also be published in a different format in the journal Midsouth Entomologist by Musser et al., which will provide further detail regarding losses.
Production data from the United States Department of Agriculture-National Agriculture Statistics Service. Accessed July 2024.
Acknowledgements
Authors
Adam Sisson, Crop Protection Network; Fred Musser and Whitney Crow, Mississippi State University; Emily Bick, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Sebe Brown, University of Tennessee; Jeff A. Davis, Louisiana State University; Chris DiFonzo, Michigan State University; Chase Floyd, University of Missouri; Scott H. Graham, Auburn University; Jeremy K. Greene, Clemson University; Kelly Hamby, University of Maryland; David Kerns, Texas A&M University; Sean Malone, Virginia Tech; David Owens, University of Delaware; Dominic D. Reisig, North Carolina State University; Phillip Roberts, University of Georgia; Nicholas J. Seiter, University of Illinois; Benjamin Thrash, University of Arkansas; Kelly Tilmon, The Ohio State University; and Raul T. Villanueva, University of Kentucky.
Reviewers
Daren Mueller, Iowa State University and Kiersten Wise, University of Kentucky
Sponsors
The authors thank the United Soybean Board and the United States Department of Agriculture - National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA-NIFA) for supporting Crop Protection Network infrastructure and resources.
This publication was developed by the Crop Protection Network, a multi-state and international collaboration of university/provincial extension specialists and public/ private professionals that provides unbiased, research-based information to farmers and agricultural personnel. This information in this publication is only a guide, and the authors assume no liability for practices implemented based on this information. Reference to products in this publication is not intended to be an endorsement to the exclusion of others that may be similar. Individuals using such products assume responsibility for their use in accordance with current directions of the manufacturer.
In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the State or local Agency that administers the program or contact USDA through the Telecommunications Relay Service at 711 (voice and TTY). Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Mail Stop 9410, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov.
This work is supported by the Crop Protection and Pest Management Extension Implementation Program from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
©2025 by the Crop Protection Network. All rights reserved.
