The Effect of Wheat on Soybean Cyst Nematode Populations in Double-Cropping Soybean Production
Published: 01/25/2023
DOI: doi.org/10.31274/cpn-20230127-0
CPN 5010. Published January 25, 2023. DOI: doi.org/10.31274/cpn-20230127-0
Leonardo F. Rocha, Southern Illinois University Carbondale; Mirian F. Pimentel, Southern Illinois University Carbondale; John Bailey, JCB Ag Research, Effingham, IL; Terry Wyciskalla, Wyciskalla Consulting, Nashville, IL; Dan Davidson, Davidson Consulting, Stanton, NE; Ahmad M. Fakhoury, Southern Illinois University Carbondale; and Jason P. Bond, Southern Illinois University Carbondale.
Summary
Field trials were conducted from 2017 to 2018 to investigate the effect of wheat on soybean cyst nematode (SCN) populations in double-cropping soybean production.
Trials were established in production fields located in South Central Illinois farms, closely simulating conditions experienced by local growers (Figure 1). From planting to harvest, most field operations were conducted by collaborating growers.
Nine fields with three levels of initial SCN pressure (low, moderate, and high) were selected in South Central Illinois. Wheat was planted in strips alternated with strips that were maintained in fallow and free of weeds over winter and early spring (See Figure 2). Soybean was planted in all these strips after the wheat harvest in late Spring.
SCN eggs were counted at four dates throughout the trials: at wheat planting, between wheat harvest and soybean planting, during soybean mid-season (R1 growth stage), and after soybean harvest.
Soybean strips that were previously planted with winter wheat had SCN counts reduced by 31.8% in the mid-season sampling and by 32.7% after the soybean harvest.
Double-cropping soybean with winter wheat can potentially suppress SCN field populations while providing additional farm income.
Introduction
The soybean cyst nematode (SCN) (Heterodera glycines Ichinohe) is widely distributed in all major soybean production areas of the United States (Tylka and Marett 2021), with the potential to cause 60% yield loss when susceptible soybean varieties are planted. SCN will often cause up to 30% yield loss without showing aboveground symptoms (plant yellowing, stunting, etc.), highlighting the importance of soil testing for SCN levels.
Double-cropped soybean is commonly planted in fields following winter wheat harvest in mid to late June. In Illinois, double-cropping has been more successful in the southern portion of the state, where favorable weather conditions allow earlier wheat harvest and soybean planting. Warmer weather in the fall season provides winter wheat an extended window for growth before exposure to freezing temperatures (Nafziger 2009). Predicted climate change and associated increasing temperatures may allow farmers to practice double-cropping in more northern areas where soybean is produced. Most acreage with the potential for wheat–soybean acreage is in Illinois, Indiana, and Eastern Ohio.
Research goals
Evaluate the effect of wheat on SCN population densities in double-cropping soybean plots under field conditions in South Central Illinois.
Identify what is causing SCN egg counts to be affected in double-cropping soybean fields.
The research
This study was conducted in production fields in South Central Illinois (Figure 1). These fields had various soil types and SCN pressure levels, allowing us to simulate conditions experienced by local soybean producers. Each field location covered 2.5 acres, with approximately twenty acres used for this research project. Each field location was divided into six strips: three were planted with winter wheat, while the remaining three were left fallow and weed-free over winter (Figure 2). After the wheat harvest in late spring, soybean was planted in all six strips.
SCN egg counts were assessed at four time points: at wheat planting, between wheat harvest and soybean planting, during soybean mid-season (R1 growth stage), and after soybean harvest. Data were subjected to statistical analyses to evaluate the effects of wheat on SCN egg counts.
Figure 1. Field locations selected in Illinois to study the impact of wheat on soybean cyst nematode (SCN) in double-cropping soybean. SCN population densities were defined as high when more than 6,500 eggs per 100 cc of soil were present, moderate from 2,000 to 6,500 eggs per 100 cc, and low when less than 2,000 eggs per 100 cc.
Figure 2. (A) A picture showing strips separating treatments in the field trial. (B) Field trial setup used for each location, showing strips and subplots.
Impact of wheat on SCN counts
In this study, SCN egg counts were similar in wheat strips compared with fallow strips at wheat harvest. SCN egg counts did not fluctuate significantly during the wheat growing season, probably because temperatures were mostly below what is required for SCN development and wheat is a non-host of SCN (Figure 3).
At the R1 growth stage of soybean (beginning of flowering), our data reflected a 31.8% reduction in SCN egg counts in wheat strips compared to fallow. Similar trends were observed at the soybean harvest sampling, where SCN egg counts were reduced by 32.7% in wheat strips compared to fallow strips (Figure 3).
Figure 3. SCN egg counts (eggs per 100 cc of soil) over the four sampling periods. The lines are the average of wheat and fallow strips across all nine locations. Please refer to the original publications for more detailed results (Rocha et al., 2021b). The asterisk (*) indicates that the treatments had statistically significant differences in SCN counts at that sampling.
How does wheat suppress SCN?
Soil samples with reduced SCN counts were used in a series of follow-up studies. Rather than being governed by a single mechanism, the suppression of SCN in soybean fields double-cropped with winter wheat is potentially linked to multiple factors. We analyzed the soil microbial community in those plots and identified improved soil microbial profiles in double-cropping soybean fields, with increased populations of beneficial organisms, some of which can parasitize SCN eggs and cysts. Finally, we observed higher concentrations of chemicals released by wheat roots and decomposing wheat stubble, which may also help to suppress SCN counts.
How can this research help you to manage SCN?
Double cropping soybean with wheat led to a reduction in SCN counts of over 30%, demonstrating a potential to suppress SCN field populations while providing additional farm income. Farmers growing full-season soybeans in South Central Illinois and other regions with similar growing conditions may benefit from introducing wheat as a winter crop to manage SCN. Incorporating wheat into double-cropping systems can help growers maintain SCN field populations under the damage threshold and reduce costs and losses caused by SCN, the primary yield-limiting disease in U.S. soybean production.
This research update is based on the work described in the following peer-reviewed research article
Rocha, L.F., Pimentel, M.F., Bailey, J., Wyciskalla, T., Davidson, D., Fakhoury, A.M., Bond, J.P. 2021. Impact of wheat on soybean cyst nematode population density in double-cropping soybean production. Frontiers in Plant Science 12: 640714. Article / Google Scholar
References
Hershman, D. E. 2014. 2015 Soybean Cyst Nematode (SCN) Management Recommendations for Kentucky. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Extension. Article / Google Scholar
Hershman, D. and Bachi, P. 1995. Effect of wheat residue and tillage on Heterodera glycines and yield of double crop soybean in Kentucky. Plant Disease 79:631–633. Article / Google Scholar
Nafziger, E. 2009. “Soybean,” in Illinois Agronomy Handbook, ed University of Illinois Extension (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Cooperative Extension Service), 27–36. Article / Google Scholar
Rocha, L. F., Bond, J. P., and Fakhoury, A. M. 2022. Wheat production alters soil microbial profiles and enhances beneficial microbes in double-cropping soybean. Frontiers in Agronomy 3:807112. Article / Google Scholar
Rocha, L. F., Gage, K. L., Pimentel, M. F., Bond, J. P., and Fakhoury, A. M. 2021a. Weeds hosting the soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines Ichinohe): Management implications in agroecological systems. Agronomy 11:146. Article / Google Scholar
Rocha, L. F., Pimentel, M. F., Bailey, J., Wyciskalla, T., Davidson, D., Fakhoury, A. M., and Bond, J. P. 2021b. Impact of wheat on soybean cyst nematode population density in double-cropping soybean production. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:640714. Article / Google Scholar
Seifert, C. A. and Lobell, D. B. 2015. Response of double-cropping suitability to climate change in the United States. Environmental Research Letters 10:024002. Article / Google Scholar
Tylka, G. L. and Marett, C. C. 2021. Known distribution of the soybean cyst nematode, Heterodera glycines, in the United States and Canada in 2020. Plant Health Progress 22: 72-74. Article / Google Scholar
Zabel, F., Putzenlechner, B., and Mauser, W. 2014. Global agricultural land resources–a high-resolution suitability evaluation and its perspectives until 2100 under climate change conditions. PLoS One 9:e114980. Article / Google Scholar
Acknowledgements
Authors
Leonardo F. Rocha, Southern Illinois University Carbondale; Mirian F. Pimentel, Southern Illinois University Carbondale; John Bailey, JCB Ag Research, Effingham, IL; Terry Wyciskalla, Wyciskalla Consulting, Nashville, IL; Dan Davidson, Davidson Consulting, Stanton, NE; Ahmad M. Fakhoury, Southern Illinois University Carbondale; and Jason P. Bond, Southern Illinois University Carbondale.
Reviewers
Travis Faske, University of Arkansas; Alyssa Koehler, University of Delaware; and Daren Mueller, Iowa State University.
Photo credits
All photos were provided by and are the property of the authors, reviewers, and/or their respective institutions.
Sponsors
This project was funded by the Illinois Soybean Association Checkoff Program. This article is published by the Crop Protection Network with funding provided by U.S. soybean farmers through the United Soybean Board, the United States Department of Agriculture – National Institute of Food and Agriculture, and the Grain Farmers of Ontario through the Canadian Agricultural Partnership (CAP), a federal-provincial territorial initiative.
Earn Certified Crop Advisor CEUs
Successfully complete a quiz for this publication to earn 0.5 CCA CEUs.
Click the link below to access the CCA CEU quiz.
This publication was developed by the Crop Protection Network, a multi-state and international collaboration of university/provincial extension specialists and public/ private professionals that provides unbiased, research-based information to farmers and agricultural personnel. This information in this publication is only a guide, and the authors assume no liability for practices implemented based on this information. Reference to products in this publication is not intended to be an endorsement to the exclusion of others that may be similar. Individuals using such products assume responsibility for their use in accordance with current directions of the manufacturer.
In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
©2024 by the Crop Protection Network. All rights reserved.