Scouting for White Mold in Soybean
Published: 01/03/2017
DOI: doi.org/10.31274/cpn-20190620-022
CPN-1010
Scouting for White Mold in Soybean
White mold (also called Sclerotinia stem rot) can substantially reduce yield in soybean. This disease, caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, is especially problematic in fields with dense canopies during early reproductive growth stages coupled with rain, fog, or dew. These conditions create a shaded, moist microclimate conducive to disease development.
Disease cycle
Sclerotia – Survival structure that is hard and black with a white interior. Can survive for many years if buried, substantially less in reduced tillage fields. Size ranges from about 1/16 to 1 inch.
Apothecia – Mushroom-like structure growing from sclerotia within the top two inches of soil profile; approximately 1/8 to 1/4 inch in diameter, tan, and cup-shaped. Often form when canopy closes.
Ascospores – Microscopic spores that are released by the millions from apothecia. Spores infect dying flowers.
Mycelia – White fungal growth that spreads from dying flowers. Can move to petioles and stems and may spread to adjacent plants. Eventually mycelia form sclerotia, both inside and outside of soybean plant parts.
Figure 1. White mold disease cycle
Risk
Taking accurate notes about where and how much white mold occurs in each soybean field is important for future disease management planning. Tracking disease levels across years will also help determine the potential sclerotia (inoculum) load and the disease risk that may be present in a particular field.
Seasonal and long-term factors favoring white mold risk in soybean include a high yield potential crop with a dense canopy, planting a susceptible variety in a field with a history of white mold, and a history of susceptible crops in the rotation. Factors favoring a dense canopy and white mold risk include early planting, narrow row width, high plant populations, and high soil fertility.
Figure 2. A susceptible flowering soybean variety.
Figure 3. Apothecia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum which produce ascospores that infect soybean flowers.
Figure 4. Signs of S. sclerotiorum include white tufts of mycelium and sclerotia produced in and outside stem tissue.
Figure 5. Sclerotia of S. sclerotiorum inside a soybean stem.
Scouting
Check near tree lines or other parts of a field that experience less wind disturbance; par ts of the field with thick canopies; and fields with a history of white mold. White mold often occurs in patches within fields. Within these patches, look for scattered dead plants.
Yield loss is more severe when plants die prematurely or stems are girdled. In addition to causing yield loss, white mold can impact seed quality and reduce grain price because of foreign material at the elevator if sclerotia are present. After harvest, check seed lots for sclerotia and infected seeds. Infected seeds are usually smaller, lighter, white, and cottony.
Figure 6. Symptoms of white mold include wilting, lodging, and plant death.
Figure 7. Sclerotia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in harvested grain.
Figure 8. Infected seed with a sclerotium in a pod.
Management
Building a management plan based on field history and best disease management practices can help reduce losses due to white mold and minimize sclerotia development for future years. Integrate several management tactics that include varietal resistance, cultural practices, and chemical and biological control products.
Fields at high risk for white mold at flowering stage (R1) may require a fungicide application and possibly a follow-up application at beginning pod stage (R3) in severe epidemic conditions. Some PPO inhibitor herbicides also may be effective at managing white mold.
Figure 9. Choosing resistant soybean varieties is the best method of reducing white mold, especially in conjunction with other best disease man- agement practices. This shows a white mold susceptible variety in front of a resistant variety.
Choosing resistant soybean varieties is the best method of reducing white mold, especially in conjunction with other best disease man- agement practices. This shows a white mold susceptible variety in front of a resistant variety.
Acknowledgments
Authors
Daren Mueller, Iowa State University; Carl Bradley, University of Illinois; Martin Chilvers, Michigan State University; Loren Giesler, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Adam Sisson, Iowa State University; Damon Smith, University of Wisconsin; Albert Tenuta, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture; and Kiersten Wise, Purdue University.
Reviewers
Emmanuel Byamukama, South Dakota State University; Anne Dorrance,The Ohio State University; Doug Jardine, Kansas State University; Dean Malvick, University of Minnesota; Samuel Markell, North Dakota State University; Laura Sweets, University of Missouri; Michael Wunsch, North Dakota State University.
Images provided by and the property of the authors, with multiple images provided by Craig Grau, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Sponsors
The Soybean Disease Management series is a multi-state collaboration sponsored by the North Central Soybean Research Program (NCSRP) through the Soybean Checkoff. This project was funded in part through Growing Forward 2 (GF2), a federal-provincial territorial initiative. The Agricultural Adaptation Council assists in the delivery of GF2 in Ontario. The authors thank the United States Department of Agriculture - National Institute of Food and Agriculture and the Grain Farmers of Ontario for their support. Contributors to this series come from land-grant universities in the North Central states and Canada.
This information is provided only as a guide, and the authors assume no liability for practices implemented based on this information.
The Crop Protection Network is a multi-state and international collaboration of university/provincial Extension specialists and public/private professionals that provides unbiased, research-based information to farmers and agricultural personnel.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W.,Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
© 2015 | All Rights Reserved | Crop Protection Network
This publication was developed by the Crop Protection Network, a multi-state and international collaboration of university/provincial extension specialists and public/ private professionals that provides unbiased, research-based information to farmers and agricultural personnel. This information in this publication is only a guide, and the authors assume no liability for practices implemented based on this information. Reference to products in this publication is not intended to be an endorsement to the exclusion of others that may be similar. Individuals using such products assume responsibility for their use in accordance with current directions of the manufacturer.
In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
©2024 by the Crop Protection Network. All rights reserved.