Don’t Get Lost in the Weeds: Additional Factors to Consider when Selecting Xtend Soybean Varieties
Published: 06/21/2019
DOI: doi.org/10.31274/cpn-20190621-000
CPN-1024
Daren Mueller, Iowa State University; Damon Smith, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Shawn Conley, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Spyridon Mourtzinis, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Yuba Kandel, Iowa State University; Tom Allen, Mississippi State University; Terry Spurlock, University of Arkansas; and Travis Faske, University of Arkansas.
Selecting the most appropriate soybean varieties each year is critical for farming operations to remain profitable. Although your top factor is often high yield potential, there are other characteristics you should consider. These other characteristics include disease-, insect-, and herbicide-resistance traits; maturity date; and target market. If you focus on only one of these aspects during the selection process it can leave your farming operation vulnerable to economic losses from the other issues.
The variety selection process can become complicated if a given variety doesn’t include the traits you want. For example, when the Roundup Ready® (RR) trait was first made commercially available over 20 years ago, some farmers selected varieties with the RR trait primarily for weed control, but they experienced yield loss from an increased incidence of sudden death syndrome (caused by Fusarium virguliforme) (Sanogo et al. 2000). Eventually, subsequent variety releases corrected this problem, but it illustrates an important lesson about immediately adopting new agricultural products. The recent introduction of soybean varieties that contain stacked herbicide trait technologies (glyphosate and dicamba resistance) address important resistant-weed management issues. However, recent research shows that these technologies, commercially available as Roundup Ready 2 Xtend® (RR2X), may lack genes (that were present in RR varieties) that made them resistant to regionally important stem diseases. Therefore, RR2X varieties are not currently suitable for all field situations. Below, we take a closer look at some factors you should consider when evaluating RR2X soybean varieties.
In 2017, plant pathologists across the United States evaluated RR2X soybean varieties for resistance to major disease-causing stem pathogens. In Wisconsin, researchers evaluated 219 soybean varieties, including 124 RR2X and 95 Roundup Ready 2 Yield® (RR2Y) varieties at three locations that had white mold (caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) (Figure 1). In an effort to tease out the general level of resistance to white mold in RR2X varieties that spanned the maturity groups appropriate to the upper Midwest, the researchers conducted a comparative analysis against RR2Y varieties that spanned the same maturity group range. This “global analysis” allowed researchers to use the power of a large data set to capture the general white mold resistance level in RR2X varieties using RR2Y varieties as an industry standard comparison.
On average, RR2X varieties had significantly more disease and had lower yields than RR2Y varieties when all other factors were considered generally equal (Figures 2 and 3). This indicates an increased risk when planting RR2X varieties in fields with a history of white mold.
Conclusion
Choosing soybean varieties can be a balancing act that is driven by competing priorities. If you let any single priority take precedence over all other aspects, it can introduce unintended risks to your farming operation. In addition to emphasizing yield, farmers should consider the most yield-limiting problems in their fields, including weeds, diseases, and insects. Finally, all varieties should stand on their own. It is important to remember that not all RR2X soybean varieties are created equal. Be sure to evaluate the varieties you would like to plant to determine if their disease resistance potential is great enough for your field. Moreover, it is important to consider unbiased research observations when considering the response of varieties to diseases of regional importance.
More information
For general information on soybean variety selection, see Considerations for Selecting Soybean Varieties (CPN 4004). To learn more about managing white mold, see Soybean Disease Management: White Mold (CPN-1005). To learn more about managing stem canker, see Soybean Disease Management: Stem Canker (CPN-1006).
Reference
Sanogo, S., Yang, X. B., and Scherm, H. 2000. Effects of herbicides on Fusarium solani f. sp. glycines and development of sudden death syndrome in glyphosate-tolerant soybean. Phytopathology 90:57-66.
Acknowledgments
Authors
Daren Mueller, Iowa State University; Damon Smith, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Shawn Conley, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Spyridon Mourtzinis, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Yuba Kandel, Iowa State University; Tom Allen, Mississippi State University; Terry Spurlock, University of Arkansas; and Travis Faske, University of Arkansas.
This publication was developed by the Crop Protection Network, a multi-state and international collaboration of university/provincial extension specialists and public/ private professionals that provides unbiased, research-based information to farmers and agricultural personnel. This information in this publication is only a guide, and the authors assume no liability for practices implemented based on this information. Reference to products in this publication is not intended to be an endorsement to the exclusion of others that may be similar. Individuals using such products assume responsibility for their use in accordance with current directions of the manufacturer.
In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
©2024 by the Crop Protection Network. All rights reserved.