Disease Development and Deoxynivalenol Accumulation in Silage Corn
Published: 11/22/2021
DOI: doi.org/10.31274/cpn-20211130-000
CPN 5008. Published November 22, 2021. DOI: doi.org/10.31274/cpn-20211130-000
Richard W. Webster, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Maxwell O. Chibuogwu, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Hannah Reed, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Brian Mueller, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Carol L. Groves, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Albert U. Tenuta, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; Martin I. Chilvers, Michigan State University; Kiersten A. Wise, University of Kentucky; and Damon Smith, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Summary
Fusarium graminearum is a fungus that causes the two diseases, Gibberella ear rot and Gibberella stalk rot, which can lower yield and feed quality of silage corn.
This fungus produces a secondary metabolite called deoxynivalenol (DON; also known as vomitoxin) during development and colonization of the corn plant, which is toxic to both humans and livestock.
Our research found that infection, colonization, and production of DON by F. graminearum in ears and stalks of corn plants can differ, and suggests that the two diseases can occur independently of each other.
Foliar fungicides reduced foliar diseases in both years, but the effects of fungicide on DON concentrations across entire plants were inconsistent in 2019.
Scouting for Gibberella ear and stalk rot and testing for DON in silage corn is important even if visual ear symptoms are not present as DON may still be accumulating in the stalks.
Introduction
Corn silage is integral for a dairy cow’s diet, often making up more than 50% of total dry matter intake during the winter months (Haerr et al. 2015). Dairy farmers need effective options to protect their corn crop from diseases which may decrease yield and/or decrease feed quality. Two such diseases are Gibberella ear rot and Gibberella stalk rot, both of which, are caused by the fungus Fusarium graminearum. Gibberella ear rot occurs after corn silks, or kernels damaged by insect/bird feeding, are infected by F. graminearum spores. The presence of red to pink fungal growth on the ear are characteristic signs of this disease (Figure 1). Gibberella stalk rot occurs after F. graminearum spores invade root tissue or infect leaf nodes and continue colonization to infect the stalk, causing a disintegration and pink-red coloration in the stalk pith. These diseases are concerning, because F. graminearum produces toxic secondary metabolites called mycotoxins. Two important mycotoxins produced are deoxynivalenol (DON, also called vomitoxin) and zearalenone (ZEN), with DON being the most commonly found in harvested grain (Wise et al. 2016). DON can cause vomiting, feed refusal, and compromised immune systems in livestock (Pestka 2010; Richard et al. 2003). These induced symptoms lead to decreased dairy cow well-being, lower milk production, and increased risk of DON contamination in milk leading to unacceptable levels for human consumption (>10 ppm; Becker-Algeri et al. 2016; Coffey et al. 2009). Foliar fungicide applications are effective tools to protect silage corn from diseases. The use of fungicides can also increase overall feed quality, and improve the conversion efficiency of feed to milk within dairy cows (Cardoso 2020; Haerr et al. 2015; Hollis et al. 2019).
Figure 1. Ears of corn displaying Gibberella ear rot with visible Fusarium graminearum mycelia.
Research goals
Evaluate the effect of foliar fungicide applications on corn foliar diseases and DON levels in silage corn
Evaluate brown midrib corn hybrids for their resistance to Gibberella ear and stalk rots and subsequent levels of DON in those plant parts
Examine the relationship of F. graminearum presence and DON levels within and between stalks and ears of corn plants
The research
In 2018 and 2019, field trials using two brown midrib (BMR) silage corn hybrids were conducted at the Arlington Agricultural Research Station in Arlington, Wisconsin. The field trials were conducted to evaluate the effect of different foliar fungicide treatments (13 in 2018 and 11 in 2019; Table 1) and application timings on foliar disease and DON. Diseases such as northern corn leaf blight, tar spot, gray leaf spot, and southern rust were observed across these years and were rated in-season and at harvest. Additionally, freshly chopped silage samples were analyzed for quality, nutritional parameters, and DON levels.
In both years a subset of field plots from the previously discussed foliar fungicide trials were used to investigate the colonization of F. graminearum and localization of DON within different parts of silage corn. These experiments are referred to as the partitioned sample trials and included fungicide treatments of Headline AMP (pyraclostrobin + metconazole) and Proline 480 SC (prothioconazole) applied at the R1 (silking) growth stage along with a non-treated control.
Both BMR hybrids were included in these experiments for a total of six treatment combinations. Gibberella ear rot and stalk rot ratings were made in-season and at harvest to examine the impact of the applied fungicides on disease severity. At harvest, stalk samples bearing ears were harvested and partitioned into stalk and ear (husks and shank attached) segments, which were processed and ground separately. Samples were then analyzed by quantifying F. graminearum DNA quantities (using quantitative polymerase chain reaction i.e. qPCR) and DON concentrations (using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay i.e. ELISA) in the partitioned segments.
Across the years and hybrids tested, there was little consistency in how fungicide treatments affected the measured yield parameters (dry matter yield, digestibility, moisture, and starch). Fungicide treatments reduced foliar disease levels (Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). In the partitioned sample trials, F. graminearum and DON were detected in all samples. Ear rot and stalk rot severity were relatively high in 2018, with DON concentrations reaching 30 ppm, and lower in 2019, with DON concentrations <5ppm. Concentrations of DON were consistently greater in stalk samples compared to the ear samples in 2019, but in the elevated disease of 2018, there was greater variation of DON accumulation between stalks and ears. Quantities of F. graminearum DNA in ears and stalks were linked to corresponding DON levels in both stalks and ears, but DON levels were not always related. For example, high levels of DON in stalks did not necessarily mean that there were high levels of DON in ears, and vice versa (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Pearson correlation matrix of quantity of Fusarium graminearum DNA and deoxynivalenol (DON) concentrations in either ears or stalks from two brown midrib corn hybrids. Significance is indicated by asterisks; p < 0.001 ‘****’. Positive correlations are indicated by blue and negative correlations are indicated by red, color intensity is an indicator of greater correlations. This figure shows that the quantity of F. graminearum DNA in ears and stalks were related to corresponding DON levels in both stalks and ears, respectively. However, high levels of DON in stalks did not necessarily mean that there were high levels of DON in ears, and vice versa.
Conclusion
In these trials, fungicides were inconsistent in their ability to reduce infection of ears and stalks by F. graminearum and subsequent DON accumulation in BMR hybrids. Therefore, we recommend planting resistant hybrids (BMR or multi-purpose), integrating cultural control methods, and applying fungicide when or where the risk of foliar disease development is high. We confirmed that DON accumulation can occur in both the corn stalk and ear. However, DON accumulated at different levels in each plant part, and DON accumulation was not related, suggesting F. graminearum infects the ear and stalk independently. Therefore, it is important to perform DON testing on silage corn to determine DON levels in stalks even when there are no visible symptoms of Gibberella ear rot on ears.
This research update is based on the work described in the following peer-reviewed research articles
Reed, H., Mueller, B., Groves, C.L., and Smith, D.L. 2021. Impact of foliar fungicides on disease and silage quality of brown midrib (BMR) corn hybrids in Wisconsin. Plant Health Progress. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHP-02-21-0019-RS
Reed, H., Mueller, B., Groves, C.L., and Smith, D.L. 2021. Presence and correlation of Fusarium graminearumand deoxynivalenol accumulation in silage corn plant parts. Plant Disease. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-21-0641-RE
References
Becker-Algeri, T. A., Castagnaro, D., de Bortoli, K., de Souza, C., Drunkler, D. A., and Badiale-Furlong, E. 2016. Mycotoxins in bovine milk and dairy products: A review. J. Food Sci. 81:R544–R552. Article / Google Scholar
Cardoso, F. C. 2020. Applying fungicide on corn plants to improve the composition of whole-plant silage in diets for dairy cattle. Appl. Anim. Sci. 36:57–69. Article
Coffey, R., Cummins, E., and Ward, S. 2009. Exposure assessment of mycotoxins in dairy milk. Food Control. 20:239–249. Article / Google Scholar
Haerr, K. J., Lopes, N. M., Pereira, M. N., Fellows, G. M., and Cardoso, F. C. 2015. Corn silage from corn treated with foliar fungicide and performance of Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 98:8962–8972. Article / Google Scholar
Hollis, M. E., Pate, R. T., Mideros, S., Fellows, G. M., Akins, M., Murphy, M. R., and Cardoso, F. C. 2019. Foliar fungicide application effects on whole plant BMR and floury corn varieties, and whole plant corn silage composition. Anim. Feed Sci.Technol. 257:114264. Article / Google Scholar
Pestka, J. J. 2010. Deoxynivalenol: mechanisms of action, human exposure, and toxicological relevance. Arch. Toxicol. 84:663–679. Article / Google Scholar
Richard, J., Payne, G. Desjardins, A., Maragos, C., Norred, W., and Pestka, J. 2003. Mycotoxins: Risks in plant, animal, and human systems. CAST Task Force Report. 139:101-103. Article
Wise, K. A., Mueller, D., Sisson, A., Smith, D. L., Bradley, C. A., and Robertson, A. E. 2016. A farmer's guide to corn diseases. St. Paul, MN, U.S.A.: APS Press, The American Phytopathological Society. Book
Acknowledgments
Authors
Richard W. Webster, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Maxwell O. Chibuogwu, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Hannah Reed, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Brian Mueller, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Carol L. Groves, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Albert U. Tenuta, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; Martin I. Chilvers, Michigan State University; Kiersten A. Wise, University of Kentucky; and Damon Smith, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Reviewers
Alison Robertson, Iowa State University; and Alyssa Koehler, University of Delaware.
Photo Credits
All photos were provided by and are the property of the authors and reviewers.
This publication was developed by the Crop Protection Network, a multi-state and international collaboration of university/provincial extension specialists and public/ private professionals that provides unbiased, research-based information to farmers and agricultural personnel. This information in this publication is only a guide, and the authors assume no liability for practices implemented based on this information. Reference to products in this publication is not intended to be an endorsement to the exclusion of others that may be similar. Individuals using such products assume responsibility for their use in accordance with current directions of the manufacturer.
In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
©2024 by the Crop Protection Network. All rights reserved.