Diagnosing Interveinal Chlorosis in Soybeans — it's not just SDS
Published: 01/20/2026
DOI: doi.org/10.31274/cpn-20190826-000
CPN-1023
Updated in 2026, this version replaces the 2019 Diagnosing Interveinal Chlorosis in Soybeans— it's not just SDS (Archived) publication.
Interveinal chlorosis, the term used for yellowing and browning of tissue between leaf veins in the upper soybean canopy, is a common symptom in soybean production (Figure 1). More often than not, it is assumed that interveinal chlorosis indicates the presence of soybean sudden death syndrome (SDS).
However, there are several additional diseases and disorders that can cause interveinal chlorosis in soybean besides SDS. Some of these diseases are new to the U.S. and Canada, or are expanding into new regions, which can complicate disease diagnosis. This article will discuss the most common diseases and disorders associated with interveinal chlorosis of soybean leaves.
Figure 1. Sudden death syndrome is one of the many causes of interveinal chlorosis of soybean leaves.
Albert Tenuta, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Agribusiness
Brown stem rot
Brown stem rot (BSR) is a disease caused by the soilborne fungus, Cadophora gregata, which often produces interveinal chlorotic leaf symptoms typically observed in the mid to upper canopy. These symptoms are usually noticed in the mid to late reproductive stages of soybean (R3 and later). Entire plants with foliar symptoms should be removed from the soil carefully and stems split to observe the internal stem tissue. Soybean stems affected by BSR will have brown pith tissue, especially near nodes (Figure 2). Roots will be healthy and not rotted. It is important to note that there are two strains (genotypes) of the fungus that causes BSR. Only the ‘A’ genotype causes typical interveinal chlorosis, while the ‘B’ genotype does not. Both genotypes cause the pith to turn brown. The geographic area can also help with identifying BSR. This disease is primarily observed in northern soybean growing regions, and is rarely, if ever, diagnosed in the Mid-South and southern states. Planting resistant soybean varieties (especially those with soybean cyst nematode resistance) and rotation to a non-host crop for two years or more are management options for BSR.
Figure 2. Foliar symptoms of brown stem rot can appear similar to other diseases, but splitting stems reveals brown pith tissue.
Adam Sisson, Iowa State University
Stem canker
Stem canker in soybean is caused by two soilborne fungi, Diaporthe aspalathi and Diaporthe caulivora. These fungi can produce different foliar symptoms on infected plants (Figure 3). Diaporthe aspalathi may cause interveinal chlorosis, while D. caulivora typically results in wilted leaves or plant death but does not usually cause interveinal chlorosis. These two fungi are widely distributed throughout the U.S., and are not geographically confined, as was previously thought. Therefore, plants exhibiting interveinal chlorosis in any state may be affected by the pathogen causing stem canker and should be submitted to diagnostic laboratories for accurate diagnosis. The symptoms associated with stem canker can begin shortly after flowering (R1), and are observed through R6. Both stem canker fungi can cause reddish brown, sunken lesions on the outside of the stem (Figure 4). These lesions are often associated with nodes and spread up the stem. Roots of plants affected with stem canker may appear healthy. Research is ongoing to better understand stem canker management. At this time, variety resistance and crop rotation are the most viable management options. For more information see the CPN publication Stem Canker (CPN 1006).
Figure 3. Foliar symptoms of stem canker on soybean.
Tom Allen, Mississippi State University
Figure 4. Sunken, reddish brown cankers are symptoms of stem canker on soybean.
Adam Sisson, Iowa State University
Sudden death syndrome
Sudden death syndrome (SDS) is primarily caused by the soilborne fungus Fusarium virguliforme. This fungus produces a toxin that moves into the leaves, causing the characteristic interveinal chlorosis that is often the first indication of SDS (Figure 5). Symptoms are most commonly observed in the mid to late reproductive stages (R3 and later). Symptoms begin as yellow spots between leaf veins which expand and turn brown, leading to interveinal chlorosis. Symptoms are most pronounced in the youngest leaves, which often die and fall prematurely, leaving petioles attached to the stem. SDS can result in plants with rotted roots, and the cortex of the stem will be brown or gray, while the pith remains white. Integrated management of SDS is important. Variety resistance, certain fungicide seed treatment active ingredients, and soybean cyst nematode management can all help manage SDS. For more information see the CPN publication Sudden Death Syndrome (CPN 1011).
Figure 5. Characteristic foliar symptoms of sudden death syndrome on soybean.
Daren Mueller, Iowa State University
Taproot decline
Taproot decline is caused by the soilborne fungus Xylaria necrophora. It causes interveinal chlorosis of plants beginning in the mid-vegetative (V4-V6) that becomes more commonly observed during advanced reproductive growth stages (R5-R6.5). Symptomatic leaves are often first observed in the lower canopy, and increase in severity as the season progresses (Figure 6). Affected taproots are dry, brittle, rotted, often with black fungal growth. When plants are pulled, the root systems often break off, and exposed taproots appear dark with brown internal discoloration, and snap easily. In certain conditions (i.e., moist environments), fungal structures known as “dead man’s” fingers can be observed on residue that remains on the soil surface or from buried residue While the geographical distribution of taproot decline is not fully known, it has been reported in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi and as far north as southern Missouri and Tennessee. Currently, management options are unknown, but research is underway to determine the impact and management for this disease.
Figure 6. Taproot decline foliar symptoms on soybean.
Tom Allen, Mississippi State University
Triazole fungicide injury
Application of fungicides in the demethylation-inhibiting class known as triazoles (Fungicide Resistance Action Committee Group 3) can cause injury or a phytotoxic effect that results in interveinal chlorosis on soybean leaves (Figure 7). Symptoms only appear on leaves, typically in the upper canopy, and stems and roots remain healthy. Injury is worse when certain triazole fungicides are applied during hot and dry conditions and can appear more injurious in situations where certain adjuvants are applied at rates equal to or exceeding 0.25% (v/v). Triazole fungicide injury is more commonly observed in the southern or Mid-South production regions due to the environmental conditions that favor injury; however, reports of phytotoxicity occurred as far north as Iowa during the 2018 season. Fungicide products that contain prothioconazole or tebuconazole are much more prone to producing phytotoxicity. In addition, the injury associated with this disorder is generally observed 21 to28 days following the application of a fungicide that contains a triazole in either a pre-mix product or a tank-mix combination. Soybean varieties vary in their response to triazole fungicide injury, which can confuse diagnosis. Yield losses due to triazole fungicide injury have not been observed; however, research continues to determine the role of the injury as well as potential methods to reduce the injury observed.
Figure 7. Triazole fungicide injury foliar symptoms on soybean.
Daren Mueller, Iowa State University
Red crown rot
Red crown rot (RCR) has increased in distribution across soybean-producing states and is caused by the soilborne fungus Calonectria ilicicola. RCR can cause interveinal chlorosis and necrosis, commonly observed at or after R3 (Figures 8 and 9). Affected plants often show reddish discoloration of the lower stem and roots, which can appear as early as vegetative stages, along with extensive root rot by the end of the season (Figure 10). Leaves may die prematurely but typically remain attached to the petioles, and the pith of the lower stem may appear gray when split. Late in the season, the fungus may produce small (less than 1/16 inch, about 2 mm) reddish-orange spherical structures (perithecia) on the lower stem and roots, which help distinguish RCR from other causes of interveinal chlorosis. Management should prioritize the use of registered seed treatments for RCR suppression and sanitation practices, including washing equipment to avoid moving infested soil and residue from field to field.
Figure 8. Red crown rot foliar symptoms.
Tom Allen, Mississippi State University
Figure 9. Interveinal chlorosis and necrosis on leaves of soybean plants infected with the RCR pathogen.
Boris Camiletti, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Figure 10. Reddish discoloration of the lower stem associated with RCR, with interveinal chlorosis and necrosis visible on soybean leaves in the background.
Boris Camiletti, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Additional diseases that produce interveinal chlorosis
There are several additional soybean diseases that may temporarily cause interveinal chlorosis depending on the environment, variety, or geographic location. These diseases include southern blight, Phytophthora root and stem rot, and white mold (Figure 11). If these diseases are the cause of the interveinal chlorosis, leaves will eventually turn brown and the interveinal chlorosis symptoms can no longer be observed.
In all cases discussed here, a field diagnosis should not simply rely on foliar symptoms. Stem and root symptoms of plants exhibiting interveinal chlorosis can help distinguish among these diseases and disorders. When the cause of the interveinal chlorosis is unclear, plant samples should be sent to a diagnostic laboratory to get an accurate diagnosis.
Figure 11. White mold foliar symptoms on soybean.
Brandon Kleinke, Iowa State University
Acknowledgements
Authors
Kiersten Wise, University of Kentucky; Tom Allen, Mississippi State University; Boris X. Camiletti, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Febina Mathew, North Dakota State University; and Daren Mueller, Iowa State University.
Reviewers
Travis Faske, University of Arkansas and Andrew Friskop, North Dakota State University
Sponsors
The authors thank the United Soybean Board and the United States Department of Agriculture - National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA-NIFA) for supporting Crop Protection Network infrastructure and resources.
How to cite: Wise, K., Allen, T., Camiletti, B., Mathew, F., and Mueller, D.. Diagnosing Interveinal Chlorosis in Soybeans — it’s not just SDS. 2026. Crop Protection Network. CPN-1023. doi.org/10.31274/cpn-20190826-000.
This publication was developed by the Crop Protection Network, a multi-state and international collaboration of university/provincial extension specialists and public/ private professionals that provides unbiased, research-based information to farmers and agricultural personnel. This information in this publication is only a guide, and the authors assume no liability for practices implemented based on this information. Reference to products in this publication is not intended to be an endorsement to the exclusion of others that may be similar. Individuals using such products assume responsibility for their use in accordance with current directions of the manufacturer.
In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the State or local Agency that administers the program or contact USDA through the Telecommunications Relay Service at 711 (voice and TTY). Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Mail Stop 9410, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov.
This work is supported by the Crop Protection and Pest Management Extension Implementation Program from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
©2026 by the Crop Protection Network. All rights reserved.