Corn Disease Loss Estimates From the United States and Ontario, Canada — 2019
Published: 12/31/2019
DOI: doi.org/10.31274/cpn-20200922-1
CPN-2007-19
Corn diseases annually reduce yield in the United States and Canada. Diseases of importance vary from year to year, and diseases that affect yield are based on many factors, including weather conditions, crop production practices, and hybrid selection and susceptibility to disease.
Plant pathologists representing 26 corn-producing U.S. states and Ontario, Canada, estimated the percent yield loss from corn disease in their states. These reports account for 13.8 billion bushels (98.1 percent) of the total corn produced in the United States and Ontario in 2019. The yield loss estimates include root rots, seedling blights, foliar diseases, crazy top, smuts, stalk rots, and ear rots.
This publication documents the impact of major diseases on corn production during 2019. The Corn Disease Working Group (CDWG) revises disease loss estimates annually. It is important to note that methods for estimating disease loss vary by state or province. The estimates may be based on statewide disease surveys; feedback from university extension, industry, and farmer representatives; and personal experience with disease losses.
The CDWG determined disease loss values based on yield before estimated losses for each state or province using this formula: bushels harvested/[(100 - percent estimated disease loss)/100]. The CDWG then formulated total bushels lost per disease ([percent loss/100] x yield before estimated loss) for each state or province.
Additional information on yield and economic losses due to corn can be found at the CPN Field Crop Disease Loss Calculator.
2019 Conditions and Production
The United States and Ontario produced more than 14 billion bushels of corn in 2019. Much of the United States experienced conditions that prevented timely planting of corn and wet conditions during fall contributing to harvest difficulties.
2019 Disease Losses
In all, 6.8 percent of the total estimated corn bushels were lost in 2019 due to disease in the 26 corn-producing states and Ontario. This is down from the 10.9 percent losses experienced in 2018, and similar to the 6.7 percent loss experienced in 2017. Table 1 provides yield loss estimates for all diseases.
Table 1. Estimated corn yield losses (millions of bushels) due to diseases in 26 U.S. corn-producing states and Ontario, Canada in the 2019 growing season.
Disease | 2019 Estimated Yield Loss (millions of bushels) |
Root Rots and Seedling Blights | |
Nematodes | 65.5 |
Root rots | 35.1 |
Seedling blights | 25.3 |
Leaf and Aboveground Diseases | |
Gray leaf spot | 146.3 |
Northern corn leaf blight | 64.0 |
Tar spot | 45.4 |
Southern rust | 29.0 |
Physoderma leaf spot | 21.3 |
Bacterial leaf streak | 19.3 |
Carbonum leaf spot | 12.0 |
Goss's wilt | 9.8 |
Common rust | 5.0 |
Eyespot | 2.9 |
Anthracnose leaf blight | 2.6 |
Common smut | 2.6 |
Southern leaf blight | 0.7 |
Holcus spot | 0.3 |
Head smut | 0.3 |
Other leaf and aboveground diseases | 0.3 |
Stewart's disease | 0.2 |
Crazy top | 0.1 |
Virus -- Maize Dwarf Mosaic | 0.0 |
Other virus and virus-like diseases | 0.0 |
Stalk Rots | |
Fusarium stalk rot | 193.4 |
Anthracnose stalk rot and top dieback | 54.1 |
Gibberella stalk rot | 34.1 |
Diplodia stalk rot | 8.5 |
Others stalk rot | 4.7 |
Charcoal rot | 2.1 |
Bacterial stalk rot | 0.4 |
Ear Rots | |
Fusarium ear rot | 107.4 |
Gibberella ear rot | 59.1 |
Others ear rot | 36.6 |
Diplodia ear rot | 18.0 |
Aspergillus ear rot | 0.6 |
Mycotoxins | |
Loss from mycotoxin contamination | 6.4% of harvested grain contaminated |
Figure 2. Nematodes caused an estimated 65.5 million bushels of corn yield loss in 2019.
Figure 3. Gibberella ear rot was estimated to have reduced yields by nearly 60 million bushels in 2019, second only to Fusarium ear rot.
Diseases in the Northern United States and Ontario
Fusarium stalk rot was the most damaging disease in the northern United States and Ontario in 2019 — more than 146 million bushels lost. Gray leaf spot caused the second greatest loss while Fusarium ear rot caused the next greatest yield loss (see Table 2).
Overall, stalk rots and ear rots contributed to the greatest yield reductions in 2019, while foliar diseases were the primary issue in 2018.
Table 2. Estimated corn yield losses due to diseases in the 12 northernmost U.S states and Ontario, Canada in 2019¹
Disease | 2019 Estimated Yield Loss (millions of bushels) |
Fusarium stalk rot | 146.5 |
Gray leaf spot | 125.8 |
Fusarium ear rot | 91.7 |
Northern corn leaf blight | 62.6 |
Gibberella ear rot | 59.0 |
Anthracnose stalk rot and top dieback | 53.4 |
Tar spot | 45.4 |
¹ U.S. States include Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.
Diseases in Southern States
Nematodes caused the greatest damage in the southern United States in 2019 and Fusarium stalk rot was second, breaking a trend beginning in 2015. Gray leaf spot, bacterial leaf streak, and southern rust were the primary foliar diseases present (Table 3).
Table 3. Estimated corn yield losses due to diseases to in the 14 southernmost states in 2019¹
Disease | 2019 Estimated Yield Loss (millions of bushels) |
Nematodes | 47.0 |
Fusarium stalk rot | 46.9 |
Gray leaf spot | 20.5 |
Fusarium ear rot | 15.7 |
Bacterial leaf streak | 9.3 |
Southern rust | 8.4 |
Root rots | 3.1 |
¹ Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia.
Mycotoxin Losses
In 2019, ear rots were not as common in the Midwest as in 2018. Plant pathologists estimated that 6.4 percent of the harvested grain in the United States and Ontario was contaminated in 2019.
Figure 1. Gray leaf spot is a common foliar disease of corn. It was estimated to have reduced yields by more than 146.3 million bushels in 2019 — more than double that of any other foliar disease that season.
Summary
Environmental conditions varied across the United States and Ontario in 2019, which affected the presence of and damage from many diseases. Overall, estimated yield losses from corn disease were much less in 2019 than 2018.
Disclaimer
The disease loss estimates in this publication were provided by members of the Corn Disease Working Group (CDWG). This information is only a guide. The values in this publication are not intended to be exact estimates of corn yield losses due to diseases. The members of the CDWG used the most appropriate means available to estimate disease losses and assume no liability resulting from the use of these estimates.
Find out More
The Crop Protection Network (CPN) is a multi-state and international collaboration of university and provincial extension specialists, and public and private professionals who provide unbiased, research-based information to farmers and agricultural personnel. Our goal is to communicate relevant information that will help professionals identify and manage field crop diseases.
Find more crop disease resources at CropProtectionNetwork.org.
Additional information on yield and economic losses due to corn can be found at the CPN Field Crop Disease Loss Calculator.
Acknowledgements
Authors
Daren Mueller, Iowa State University; Kiersten Wise, University of Kentucky; and Adam Sisson, Iowa State University.
Contributors
Members of the Corn Disease Working Group are university scientists from many institutions, including: Auburn University, University of Arkansas, Colorado State University, Cornell University, University of Delaware, University of Guelph, University of Illinois, Iowa State University, Kansas State University, University of Kentucky, Louisiana State University, Michigan State University, University of Minnesota, Mississippi State University, University of Missouri, University of Nebraska, North Carolina State University, North Dakota State University, Ohio State University, Penn State University, Purdue University, South Dakota State University, University of Tennessee, Texas A&M University, University of Virginia, and University of Wisconsin-Madison.
The following individuals contributed to this publication:
Austin Hagan and Ed Sikora, Alabama; Travis Faske, Arkansas; Ron Meyer, Colorado; Alyssa Koehler, Delaware; Nathan Kleczewski, Illinois; Darcy Telenko, Indiana; Alison Robertson, Iowa; Doug Jardine, Kansas; Carl Bradley, Kentucky; Trey Price, Louisiana; Alyssa Koehler, Maryland; Marty Chilvers, Michigan; Dean Malvick, Minnesota; Tom Allen, Mississippi; Kaitlyn Bissonnette, Missouri; Tamra Jackson-Ziems, Nebraska; Gary Bergstrom, New York; Ron Heiniger and Lindsey Thiessen, North Carolina; Andrew Friskop, North Dakota; Pierce Paul, Ohio; Albert Tenuta, Ontario; Greg Roth, Alyssa Collins, and Paul Esker, Pennsylvania; Emmanuel Byamukama, South Dakota; Heather Kelly, Tennessee; Tom Isakeit, Texas; Hillary Mehl, Virginia; and Damon Smith, Wisconsin.
Photos
Photos by Adam Sisson and Gary Munkvold, Iowa State University; and Tom Hillyer.
Sponsors
In addition to support from United States Department of Agriculture - National Institute of Food and Agriculture, this project was funded in part through Growing Forward 2 (GF2), a federal-provincial territorial initiative. The Agricultural Adaptation Council assists in the delivery of GF2 in Ontario.
This publication was developed by the Crop Protection Network, a multi-state and international collaboration of university/provincial extension specialists and public/ private professionals that provides unbiased, research-based information to farmers and agricultural personnel. This information in this publication is only a guide, and the authors assume no liability for practices implemented based on this information. Reference to products in this publication is not intended to be an endorsement to the exclusion of others that may be similar. Individuals using such products assume responsibility for their use in accordance with current directions of the manufacturer.
In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
©2024 by the Crop Protection Network. All rights reserved.